Literature DB >> 31893753

Comparison of volitional opposing and following responses across speakers with different vocal histories.

Sona Patel1, Li Gao2, Sophie Wang2, Christine Gou2, Jordan Manes2, Donald A Robin3, Charles R Larson2.   

Abstract

Research has shown that people who are instructed to volitionally respond to pitch-shifted feedback either produce responses that follow the shift direction with a short latency of 100-200 ms or oppose the shift direction with longer latencies of 300-400 ms. This difference in response latencies prompted a comparison of three groups of vocalists with differing abilities, non-trained English-speaking subjects, non-trained Mandarin-speaking subjects, and trained English-speaking singers. All subjects produced short latency following responses and long latency opposing responses, and in most cases the opposing responses were preceded by a shorter latency following response. Across groups, the magnitudes of the opposing and following responses were largest for the Mandarin speakers. Singers produced the smallest opposing response magnitudes, suggesting differences in the pitch goals of the two groups. Opposing response latencies were longest for the English and Mandarin speaking subjects and shortest for the trained singers, demonstrating that musical training increases the speed of producing the opposing responses. The presence of similar latencies of small following responses preceding larger opposing responses in all groups suggests that the tendency to mimic changes in sounds to which a person is attending are not influenced by vocal training or experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31893753      PMCID: PMC7043849          DOI: 10.1121/1.5134769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  60 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control.

Authors:  D M. Wolpert; R C. Miall
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1996-11

3.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Letter: Vocal frequency and vertical larynx positioning by singers and nonsingers.

Authors:  T Shipp; K Izdebski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback.

Authors:  T A Burnett; M B Freedland; C R Larson; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Lindsey Sattler; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Avian vocal mimicry: a unified conceptual framework.

Authors:  Anastasia H Dalziell; Justin A Welbergen; Branislav Igic; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-07-30

8.  Vocal mimicry of computer-generated sounds and vocal labeling of objects by a bottlenosed dolphin, Tursiops truncatus.

Authors:  D G Richards; J P Wolz; L M Herman
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  The sensitivity of auditory-motor representations to subtle changes in auditory feedback while singing.

Authors:  Dwayne Keough; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Reflexive and volitional voice fundamental frequency responses to an anticipated feedback pitch error.

Authors:  Theresa A Burnett; Katie E McCurdy; Jessica C Bright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pitch Discrimination Testing in Patients with a Voice Disorder.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Antonia M Chacon; Daniel Novakovic; Nicola J Hodges; Paul N Carding; Catherine Madill
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.