Hasini R Weerathunge1,2, Tiffany Voon3, Monique Tardif4, Dante Cilento4, Cara E Stepp5,4,6. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. hasiniw@bu.edu. 2. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. hasiniw@bu.edu. 3. Department of Biology, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Speech production is a complex motor task involving multiple subsystems. The relationships between these subsystems need to be comprehensively investigated to understand the underlying mechanisms of speech production. The goal of this paper is to examine the differential contributions of 1) auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms, and 2) laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems on speech motor control at an individual speaker level using altered auditory and somatosensory feedback paradigms. METHODS: Twenty young adults completed speaking tasks in which sudden and unpredictable auditory and physical perturbations were applied to the laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems. Auditory perturbations were applied to laryngeal or articulatory acoustic features of speech. Physical perturbations were applied to the larynx and the jaw. Pearson-product moment correlation coefficients were calculated between 1) auditory and somatosensory reflexive responses to investigate relationships between auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms, and 2) laryngeal and articulatory reflexive responses as well as acuity measures to investigate the relationship between auditory-motor features of laryngeal and articulatory subsystems. RESULTS: No statistically significant correlations were found concerning the relationships between auditory and somatosensory feedback. No statistically significant correlations were found between auditory-motor features in the laryngeal and articulatory control subsystems. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems operate with differential auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms. The outcomes suggest that current models of speech motor control should consider decoupling laryngeal and articulatory domains to better model speech motor control processes.
PURPOSE: Speech production is a complex motor task involving multiple subsystems. The relationships between these subsystems need to be comprehensively investigated to understand the underlying mechanisms of speech production. The goal of this paper is to examine the differential contributions of 1) auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms, and 2) laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems on speech motor control at an individual speaker level using altered auditory and somatosensory feedback paradigms. METHODS: Twenty young adults completed speaking tasks in which sudden and unpredictable auditory and physical perturbations were applied to the laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems. Auditory perturbations were applied to laryngeal or articulatory acoustic features of speech. Physical perturbations were applied to the larynx and the jaw. Pearson-product moment correlation coefficients were calculated between 1) auditory and somatosensory reflexive responses to investigate relationships between auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms, and 2) laryngeal and articulatory reflexive responses as well as acuity measures to investigate the relationship between auditory-motor features of laryngeal and articulatory subsystems. RESULTS: No statistically significant correlations were found concerning the relationships between auditory and somatosensory feedback. No statistically significant correlations were found between auditory-motor features in the laryngeal and articulatory control subsystems. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems operate with differential auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms. The outcomes suggest that current models of speech motor control should consider decoupling laryngeal and articulatory domains to better model speech motor control processes.
Authors: Defne Abur; Austeja Subaciute; Ayoub Daliri; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Ashling A Lupiani; Dante Cilento; Nicole M Enos; Hasini R Weerathunge; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 2.674