Literature DB >> 29966716

Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.

Elliot Collins1, Amanda K Robinson2, Marlene Behrmann3.   

Abstract

Humans recognize faces with ease, despite the complexity of the task and of the visual system which underlies it. Different spatial regions, including both the core and extended face processing networks, and distinct temporal stages of processing have been implicated in face recognition, but there is ongoing controversy regarding the extent to which the mechanisms for recognizing a familiar face differ from those for an unfamiliar face. Here, we used electroencephalogram (EEG) and flicker SSVEP, a high signal-to-noise approach, and searchlight decoding methods to elucidate the mechanisms mediating the processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the time domain. Familiar and unfamiliar faces were presented periodically at 15 Hz, 6 Hz and 3.75 Hz either upright or inverted in separate blocks, with the rationale that faster frequencies require shorter processing times per image and tap into fundamentally different levels of visual processing. The 15 Hz trials, likely to reflect early visual processing, exhibited enhanced neural responses for familiar over unfamiliar face trials, but only when the faces were upright. In contrast, decoding methods revealed similar classification accuracies for upright and inverted faces for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. For the 6 Hz frequency, familiar faces had lower amplitude responses than unfamiliar faces, and decoding familiarity was more accurate for upright compared with inverted faces. Finally, the 3.75 Hz frequency revealed no main effects of familiarity, but decoding showed significant correlations with behavioral ratings of face familiarity, suggesting that activity evoked by this slow presentation frequency reflected higher-level, cognitive aspects of familiarity processing. This three-way dissociation between frequencies reveals that fundamentally different stages of the visual hierarchy are modulated by face familiarity. The combination of experimental and analytical approaches used here represent a novel method for elucidating spatio-temporal characteristics within the visual system.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; FPVS; Face processing; Face recognition; Famous faces; Frequency tagging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29966716      PMCID: PMC6139062          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  72 in total

1.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

Authors:  R R Althoff; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

3.  The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing.

Authors:  M L Gorno-Tempini; C J Price; O Josephs; R Vandenberghe; S F Cappa; N Kapur; R S Frackowiak; M L Tempini
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.

Authors:  Wanyi Huang; Xia Wu; Liping Hu; Lei Wang; Yulong Ding; Zhe Qu
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 5.  Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data.

Authors:  Tijl Grootswagers; Susan G Wardle; Thomas A Carlson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer; Zoi Manesi; Alice Towler; Michael G Reynolds; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Selective Attention to Faces in a Rapid Visual Stream: Hemispheric Differences in Enhancement and Suppression of Category-selective Neural Activity.

Authors:  Genevieve Quek; Dan Nemdorov; Bruno Rossion; Joan Liu-Shuang
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Individual Differences in Face Identity Processing with Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.

Authors:  Buyun Xu; Joan Liu-Shuang; Bruno Rossion; James Tanaka
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.

Authors:  V Bruce; Z Henderson; C Newman; A M Burton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2001-09

10.  N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.

Authors:  Jürgen M Kaufmann; Stefan R Schweinberger; A Mike Burton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Influence of Object-Color Knowledge on Emerging Object Representations in the Brain.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Genevieve L Quek; Amanda K Robinson; Tijl Grootswagers; Thomas A Carlson; Anina N Rich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The nature of neural object representations during dynamic occlusion.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Denise Moerel; Anina N Rich; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.644

3.  Attention allocation on mobile app interfaces when human interacts with them.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Gaochao Cui; Yan Li; Jianhai Zhang; Wanzeng Kong; Andrzej Cichocki; Junhua Li
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Modeling temporal dynamics of face processing in youth and adults.

Authors:  Caitlin M Hudac; Adam Naples; Trent D DesChamps; Marika C Coffman; Anna Kresse; Tracey Ward; Cora Mukerji; Benjamin Aaronson; Susan Faja; James C McPartland; Raphael Bernier
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  How face perception unfolds over time.

Authors:  Katharina Dobs; Leyla Isik; Dimitrios Pantazis; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Differentiation of Types of Visual Agnosia Using EEG.

Authors:  Sarah M Haigh; Amanda K Robinson; Pulkit Grover; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-18

7.  Synchronised neural signature of creative mental imagery in reality and augmented reality.

Authors:  I Giannopulu; G Brotto; T J Lee; A Frangos; D To
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-02-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.