Literature DB >> 24777435

Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Sheraz R Markar1, Henner Schmidt, Sonia Kunz, Artur Bodnar, Michal Hubka, Donald E Low.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the implementation and evolution of a multidisciplinary esophagectomy care pathway on postoperative outcomes over a 20-year experience. STUDY
DESIGN: All patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer between 1991 and 2012 were included. Patients were divided into four groups (Gp1 1991-1996, Gp2 1997-2002, Gp3 2003-2007, and Gp4 2008-2012).
RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-five patients were included (Gp1 92, Gp2 159, Gp3 161, and Gp4 183). Age remained consistent over time; however, a progressive significant increase was observed in BMI and Charlson comorbidity index. Increases were also noted in patients with clinical stage III cancers, in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, in salvage esophagectomy and in the utilization of pretreatment jejunostomy. We observed a significant reduction in estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative room IV fluid administration (ORFA) during the study period. Median ICU stay and length of hospital stay (LOS) (10 (5-50) to 8 (5-115) days) decreased over time. In-hospital mortality (0.3 %) and postoperative complications remained consistent over time. cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis showed that EBL, ORFA, and LOS all declined during the study period, reaching mean values at case 120, 310, and 175, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that process improvement within the pathway is likely more significant than the level of comorbidities, application of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, or technical approach in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24777435     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2520-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  46 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K M Chu; S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Jing Xu; Jian-Feng Gong; Yang Bao; Li-Fei Xie; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Pascal Bucher; Monika E Hagen; Gilles Chassot; Pascale Koutny-Fong; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Near-total esophagectomy: the influence of standardized multimodal management and intraoperative fluid restriction.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; Robert T Wilcox; Hugh W Allen; Donald E Low
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  A prospective randomized trial comparing traditional and fast-track patient care in elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Bernd Muehling; Hubert Schelzig; Peter Steffen; Rainer Meierhenrich; Ludger Sunder-Plassmann; Karl-Heinz Orend
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Donald E Low
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  17 in total

1.  Fluid administration and morbidity in transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Oliver S Eng; Renee L Arlow; Dirk Moore; Chunxia Chen; John E Langenfeld; David A August; Darren R Carpizo
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Research and Development of Semantics-based Sharable Clinical Pathway Systems.

Authors:  Hua-Qiong Wang; Tian-Shu Zhou; Yi-Fan Zhang; Li Chen; Jing-Song Li
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  [Perioperative management of transthoracic oesophagectomies : Fundamentals of interdisciplinary care and new approaches to accelerated recovery after surgery].

Authors:  R Lambertz; H Drinhaus; D Schedler; M Bludau; W Schröder; T Annecke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Evolution in the Treatment of Esophageal Disease at a Single Academic Institution: 2004-2013.

Authors:  James P Dolan; Patrick J McLaren; Brian S Diggs; Paul H Schipper; Brandon H Tieu; Brett C Sheppard; Erin W Gilbert; Molly A Conroy; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 5.  State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience.

Authors:  Silvia Salvans; Luis Grande; Mariagiulia Dal Cero; Manuel Pera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  Regional Multiteam Systems in Cancer Care Delivery.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; John R T Monson; Irfan Rizvi; Ann Savastano; James S A Green; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  [Profit center analysis of esophagectomy : Economical analysis of transthoracic esophagectomy depending on postoperative complications].

Authors:  C T Baltin; M Bludau; F Kron; T Zander; M Hallek; A H Hölscher; W Schröder
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Multidisciplinary treatment of T1a adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: contemporary comparison of endoscopic and surgical treatment in physiologically fit patients.

Authors:  Henner M Schmidt; Kamran Mohiuddin; Artur M Bodnar; Mustapha El Lakis; Stephen Kaplan; Shayan Irani; Ian Gan; Andrew Ross; Donald E Low
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Perioperative management and outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: case study of a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Tzu Chang; Po-Ni Hsiao; Man-Yin Tsai; Pei-Ming Huang; Ya-Jung Cheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  [Perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery program for Ivor Lewis esophagectomy : First experiences of a high-volume center].

Authors:  C Mallmann; H Drinhaus; H Fuchs; L M Schiffmann; C Cleff; E Schönau; C J Bruns; T Annecke; W Schröder
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.