Literature DB >> 35727482

State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience.

Silvia Salvans1, Luis Grande1, Mariagiulia Dal Cero1, Manuel Pera2.   

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a framework to standardize care processes and improve outcomes. The results of this multimodal and multidisciplinary approach based on actions focused on reducing physiological surgical stress in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods are beneficial in reducing morbidity and hospital stay, without increasing readmissions across different surgical settings. The implementation of ERAS in resection procedures of esophageal and gastric cancer has been challenging due to the complexity of these surgical techniques and the high risk of complications. Despite the limited evidence of ERAS in esophagectomy operations, systematic reviews and meta-analysis have confirmed a reduction of pulmonary complications and hospital stay without increasing readmissions. In gastrectomy operations, the implementation of ERAS reduces the use of nasogastric tubes and intraabdominal drains, facilitates early diet, and reduces the length of hospital stay, without increasing complications. There is, however, wide heterogeneity and absence of standardization in the number and definition of the ERAS components. The development of ERAS consensus guidelines including procedure-specific components may reduce this variability. Regardless growing evidence of the effectiveness of ERAS, the adherence rate is still low. The commitment of the multidisciplinary team and leadership is critical in the application and refinement of ERAS protocols in parallel with periodic audits. Pre- and post-habilitation methods are emerging concepts to be incorporated in ERAS protocols.
© 2022. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Esophagectomy; Gastrectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35727482     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01311-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  62 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection.

Authors:  K C H Fearon; O Ljungqvist; M Von Meyenfeldt; A Revhaug; C H C Dejong; K Lassen; J Nygren; J Hausel; M Soop; J Andersen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 2.  Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery.

Authors:  J Wind; S W Polle; P H P Fung Kon Jin; C H C Dejong; M F von Meyenfeldt; D T Ubbink; D J Gouma; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines.

Authors:  John M Findlay; Richard S Gillies; Julian Millo; Bruno Sgromo; Robert E K Marshall; Nicholas D Maynard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation.

Authors:  H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  A multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation in patients undergoing abdominothoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  G Brodner; E Pogatzki; H Van Aken; H Buerkle; C Goeters; C Schulzki; H Nottberg; N Mertes
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery in gastrointestinal surgery: upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Dimitri Dorcaratto; Luís Grande; Manuel Pera
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  [Multimodal rehabilitation program in elective colorectal surgery: Impact on hospital costs].

Authors:  Sílvia Salvans; M José Gil-Egea; Miguel Pera; Leyre Lorente; Francesc Cots; Marta Pascual; Sandra Alonso; Ricard Courtier; Luis Grande
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 1.653

Review 9.  Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; D E Low
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients.

Authors:  A Nicholson; M C Lowe; J Parker; S R Lewis; P Alderson; A F Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.