Literature DB >> 29707319

Perioperative management and outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: case study of a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan.

Tzu Chang1, Po-Ni Hsiao1, Man-Yin Tsai1, Pei-Ming Huang2, Ya-Jung Cheng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality and complication rates for surgical esophagectomy remain high despite progress in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Minimally invasive surgery and intraoperative goal-directed fluid management are gaining popularity in Taiwan; however, perioperative complications and short-term outcomes have been rarely reported. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the surgical procedures performed as well as the perioperative outcomes and treatments after esophagectomy in a high-volume medical center in Taiwan. The goals of this study are to compare the complications and the following treatment between different surgical procedures and to analyze if any preoperative coexisting disease and anesthesia conduct might be associated with postoperative complications and hospitalization course.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who had undergone esophagectomy and reconstruction in 2015. Patient characteristics, type of surgery performed, method of anesthesia, postoperative hospitalization course, and additional surgical interventions were reviewed and analyzed.
RESULTS: In total, 64 patients were included. Among them, 58 patients (90.6%) were reported squamous cell carcinoma, 33 patients (51.6%) received McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), and 20 (31.3%) received Ivor-Lewis MIE. The most common postoperative complications were pulmonary complications (18.7%), such as empyema and pleural effusion, dysrhythmias (14.1%), anastomosis leakage (14.1%), vocal cord paralysis (9.4%), gastric tube stenosis (4.7%), chyle leakage (4.7%), and acute kidney injury (AKI, 4.7%). Twenty-five percent of patients received secondary operative interventions for the aforementioned complications. Postoperative arrhythmia (P=0.042), pulmonary complications (P=0.009), and AKI (P=0.015) were significantly associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were 3.1% and 4.7% respectively. Patients with preoperative arrhythmias have a higher risk of developing post-operative dysrhythmia (P=0.013) and lung complications (P=0.036). Patients with an underlying heart disease are at higher risk of post-op AKI (P=0.002) and second surgical intervention (P=0.013). Chronic kidney diseases are associated with post-op dysrhythmia (P=0.013), lung complications (P=0.036) and post-op AKI (P≤0.01). Although McKeown MIE bore a significantly longer surgical time and higher intraoperatively-infused crystalloid than did Ivor Lewis MIE, there were no significant differences regarding postoperative cardiothoracic complications and patient outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative outcomes of McKeown MIE and Ivor-Lewis MIE were comparable in our center and short term outcomes were similar to those in previous reports. However, despite neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), the use of minimally invasive techniques, and well-controlled anesthesia, the incidence of perioperative complications remains high. Our results suggest that patients with preoperative comorbidity of arrhythmia, heart diseases, and CKD are associated with more common post-operative complications. Furthermore, postoperative dysrhythmias, pulmonary complications, and AKI warrant special anesthetic and surgical care to prevent prolonged ICU stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; esophageal neoplasms; outcome assessment

Year:  2018        PMID: 29707319      PMCID: PMC5906220          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  17 in total

1.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.

Authors:  Johan L Dikken; Anneriet E Dassen; Valery E P Lemmens; Hein Putter; Pieta Krijnen; Lydia van der Geest; Koop Bosscha; Marcel Verheij; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Michel W J M Wouters
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Is esophagectomy the paradigm for volume-outcome relationships?

Authors:  Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Incidence and management of chylothorax after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus.

Authors:  Sebastian Brinkmann; Wolfgang Schroeder; Kristina Junggeburth; Christian A Gutschow; Marc Bludau; Arnulf H Hoelscher; Jessica M Leers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.

Authors:  Jennifer Straatman; Nicole van der Wielen; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig; Joris J G Scheepers; Miguel A Cuesta; Misha D P Luyer; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Frans van Workum; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reoperative Surgery After Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Keouna Pather; Alexander D Ghannam; Shoshana Hacker; Christina Guerrier; Erin M Mobley; Rhemar Esma; Ziad T Awad
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 2.  Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianqing Deng; Qingqing Su; Zhipeng Ren; Jiaxin Wen; Zhiqiang Xue; Lianbin Zhang; Xiangyang Chu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Stroke Volume Variation-Guided Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Did Not Significantly Reduce the Incidence of Early Postoperative Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Yuwei Qiu; Huijie Lu; Meiying Xu; Jingxiang Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-06

Review 4.  Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy.

Authors:  Mojtaba Ahmadinejad; Ali Soltanian; Leila Haji Maghsoudi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-23

5.  McKeown or Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingpu Wang; Jingfeng Hu; Dengyan Zhu; Kankan Wang; Chunzhi Gao; Tingting Shan; Yang Yang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.