Literature DB >> 26319974

Fluid administration and morbidity in transhiatal esophagectomy.

Oliver S Eng1, Renee L Arlow1, Dirk Moore2, Chunxia Chen2, John E Langenfeld3, David A August3, Darren R Carpizo4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity. Optimizing perioperative fluid administration is one potential strategy to mitigate morbidity. We sought to investigate the relationship of intraoperative fluid (IOF) administration to outcomes in patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy with particular attention to malnourished patients, who may be more susceptible to the effects of fluid overload.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy from 2000-2013 were identified from a retrospective database. IOF rates (mL/kg/hr) were determined and their relationship to outcomes compared. To examine the impact of malnutrition, we stratified patients based on median preoperative serum albumin and compared outcomes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 211 patients comprised the cohort. 74% of patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Linear regression analyses were performed comparing independent perioperative variables to four outcomes variables: length of stay, complications per patient, major complications, and Clavien-Dindo classification. IOF rate was significantly associated with three of four outcomes on univariate analysis. Significantly more patients with a preoperative albumin level ≤3.7 g/dL who received more than the median IOF rate experienced more severe complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased intraoperative fluid administration is associated with perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy. Patients with lower preoperative albumin levels may be particularly sensitive to the effects of volume overload.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluids; Morbidity; Transhiatal esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319974      PMCID: PMC4914131          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  28 in total

1.  Perioperative fluid management and major respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  D Casado; F López; R Martí
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess.

Authors:  K Holte; N E Sharrock; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Rentz; David Bull; David Harpole; Stephen Bailey; Leigh Neumayer; Theodore Pappas; Barbara Krasnicka; William Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Shukri Khuri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  The drowning whipple: perioperative fluid balance and outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  G Paul Wright; Tracy J Koehler; Alan T Davis; Mathew H Chung
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Intraoperative fluid administration is associated with perioperative outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Oliver S Eng; Julie Goswami; Dirk Moore; Chunxia Chen; Christopher J Gannon; David A August; Darren R Carpizo
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 8.  Intraoperative fluid restriction improves outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Girish P Joshi
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on outcome after resection for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  A Watson; P R Allen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Goal-directed fluid therapy using stroke volume variation does not result in pulmonary fluid overload in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Sebastian Haas; Volker Eichhorn; Ted Hasbach; Constantin Trepte; Asad Kutup; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of intraoperative fluid administration on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing McKeown esophagogastrectomy.

Authors:  Hongliang Wu; Wen Wang; Gefei Zhao; Qi Xue
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Postoperative fluid overload is a risk factor for adverse surgical outcome in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective study in 335 patients.

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Birte Kulemann; Goran Marjanovic; Svenja Bregenzer; Frank Makowiec; Jens Hoeppner
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Apurva Ashok; Devayani Niyogi; Priya Ranganathan; Sandeep Tandon; Maheema Bhaskar; George Karimundackal; Sabita Jiwnani; Madhavi Shetmahajan; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.549

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.