Literature DB >> 23117475

Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older.

Sheraz R Markar1, Donald E Low.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess short and long-term outcomes for patients aged ≥80 years undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy.
METHODS: All patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer between 1991 and 2011 had information prospectively entered into a database; patients were divided into elderly (≥80 years) and younger (<80 years) groups.
RESULTS: Of the 500 patients included, 32 (6.4%) were ≥80 years of age. Octogenarians had increased Charlson comorbidity index and were less likely to receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (6.3 vs. 39.7%). Analysis of operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay revealed no significant differences between the groups. Patients ≥80 years old had increased total postoperative morbidity (68.8 vs. 44.9%), specifically arrhythmia (31.3 vs. 16.7%) and pneumonia (18.8 vs. 8.3%). There were no in-hospital mortalities in patients ≥80 years (0 vs. 0.4%), and there was no significant difference in overall survival between the groups (53.2 ± 9.1 vs. 77.6 ± 4.8 months; P = 0.58). Subset analysis demonstrated similar morbidity and length of hospital stay for patients between 70 and 79 years (n = 132) and those ≥80 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy are at greater risk of postoperative complications. However, there were no significant differences in other major parameters, including length of hospital stay, mortality, and survival, indicating that selected patients ≥80 years old can and should be assessed by an experienced surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23117475     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2703-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  27 in total

1.  Patient Selection for Oesophagectomy: Impact of Age and Comorbidities on Outcome.

Authors:  Gregory O'Grady; Ahmer M Hameed; Tony C Pang; Emma Johnston; Vincent T Lam; Arthur J Richardson; Michael J Hollands
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Management and Outcomes of Esophageal Perforation: A National Study of 2,564 Patients in England.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Hugh Mackenzie; Tom Wiggins; Alan Askari; Omar Faiz; Giovanni Zaninotto; George B Hanna
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Increasing age is a predictor of short-term outcomes in esophagectomy: a propensity score adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Christopher C Stahl; Dennis J Hanseman; Koffi Wima; Jeffrey M Sutton; Gregory C Wilson; Samuel F Hohmann; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Esophageal Cancer Treatment Is Underutilized Among Elderly Patients in the USA.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Miloslawa Stem; Amanda L Blackford; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Hyperglycemia 3 days after esophageal cancer surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection.

Authors:  Naoko Ito; Takeshi Iwaya; Kenichiro Ikeda; Yusuke Kimura; Yuji Akiyama; Masafumi Konosu; Kaoru Ishida; Hisataka Fujiwara; Koki Otsuka; Hiroyuki Nitta; Masahiro Kashiwaba; Keisuke Koeda; Satoshi Nishizuka; Masaru Mizuno; Akira Sasaki; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Hand grip strength as a predictor of postoperative complications in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shinsuke Sato; Erina Nagai; Yusuke Taki; Masaya Watanabe; Yuki Watanabe; Kiyokaze Nakano; Hiroyuki Yamada; Takuya Chiba; Yuichiro Ishii; Hiroshi Ogiso; Masakazu Takagi
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.230

8.  Treatment selection for esophageal cancer: evaluation from a nationwide database.

Authors:  Yasuo Hamamoto; Naoki Sakakibara; Fumio Nagashima; Yuko Kitagawa; Takahiro Higashi
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.230

9.  Esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yuan Zeng; Wenhua Liang; Jun Liu; Jiaxi He; Calvin S H Ng; Chia-Chuan Liu; René Horsleben Petersen; Gaetano Rocco; Thomas D'Amico; Alessandro Brunelli; Haiquan Chen; Xiuyi Zhi; Xiao Dong; Wei Wang; Fei Cui; Dakai Xiao; Wenjun Wang; Wei Yang; Hui Pan; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Feasibility of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a case-control study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tsuchiya; Chikara Kunisaki; Sho Sato; Yusaku Tanaka; Kei Sato; Jun Watanabe; Kazuhisa Takeda; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.