Literature DB >> 24764461

relax: the analysis of biomolecular kinetics and thermodynamics using NMR relaxation dispersion data.

Sébastien Morin1, Troels E Linnet2, Mathilde Lescanne2, Paul Schanda2, Gary S Thompson2, Martin Tollinger2, Kaare Teilum2, Stéphane Gagné2, Dominique Marion2, Christian Griesinger2, Martin Blackledge2, Edward J d'Auvergne1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a powerful tool for observing the motion of biomolecules at the atomic level. One technique, the analysis of relaxation dispersion phenomenon, is highly suited for studying the kinetics and thermodynamics of biological processes. Built on top of the relax computational environment for NMR dynamics is a new dispersion analysis designed to be comprehensive, accurate and easy-to-use. The software supports more models, both numeric and analytic, than current solutions. An automated protocol, available for scripting and driving the graphical user interface (GUI), is designed to simplify the analysis of dispersion data for NMR spectroscopists. Decreases in optimization time are granted by parallelization for running on computer clusters and by skipping an initial grid search by using parameters from one solution as the starting point for another -using analytic model results for the numeric models, taking advantage of model nesting, and using averaged non-clustered results for the clustered analysis.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software relax is written in Python with C modules and is released under the GPLv3+ license. Source code and precompiled binaries for all major operating systems are available from http://www.nmr-relax.com. CONTACT: edward@nmr-relax.com.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24764461      PMCID: PMC4103588          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


Biological macromolecules are intricate machines, and their functions are closely related to their motions. These motions can be studied experimentally at the atomic level by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Many important biological processes occur on the s to ms time scale, and for atoms exchanging between different states, NMR relaxation dispersion can be observed. By studying this exchange process, kinetic and thermodynamic information can be obtained. For exchanging atoms, their nuclear spin magnetization is described by the Bloch–McConnell equations (McConnell, 1958). Using experimental data, the solution to these equations reveals both populations of the molecular states (thermodynamics) and rates of exchange between them (kinetics). Though the general solution valid for all motions remains intractable, analytic solutions with restricted motions are available and are frequently used. The equations can also be solved numerically. Two NMR dispersion methods are used for analysing motions: Single, Zero, Double or Multiple Quantum (SQ, ZQ, DQ, MQ) CPMG (Carr and Purcell, 1954; Meiboom and Gill, 1958); or (Deverell ). Combined SQ, ZQ, DQ and MQ data will be labelled as Multiple-MQ (MMQ) data. Various models are used to analyse different data and motions. The simplest one is that of no motion (No Rex). For SQ CPMG-type experiments, analytic models include the original Luz and Meiboom (1963) multiple-site fast exchange models (LM63), the Carver and Richards (1972) and population-skewed Ishima and Torchia (1999) 2-site models for most time scales (CR72, IT99) and the Tollinger 2-site very slow exchange model (TSMFK01). The CR72 model has been extended by Korzhnev for MMQ data. For -type data, analytic equations include the Meiboom (1961) 2-site fast exchange model for on-resonance data (M61), extended by Davis to off-resonance data (DPL94), and the Trott and Palmer (2002) and Miloushev and Palmer (2005) 2-site models for non-fast and all time scales (TP02, MP05). Different numeric solutions (NS) can be designed for SQ or MMQ data. Diverse software solutions exist for analysing relaxation dispersion data including CPMGFit (http://www.palmer.hs.columbia.edu/software/cpmgfit.html), cpmg_fit (available on request from Dmitry Korzhnev), CATIA (Hansen ), NESSY (Bieri and Gooley, 2011), GUARDD (Kleckner and Foster, 2012), ShereKhan (Mazur ) and GLOVE (Sugase ). The software relax (d’Auvergne and Gooley, 2008) is a platform for studying molecular dynamics using experimental NMR data, and can be used as a numerical computing environment. Herein, support for relaxation dispersion within relax is presented. Distributed as part of relax, this is the most comprehensive dispersion package supporting the greatest number of dispersion models and NMR data types. The number of dispersion models supported by relax is extensive (Table 1). This allows for detailed comparisons between modern numeric and traditional analytic approaches. Different user interfaces (UIs) can be used to analyse dispersion data including the prompt, scripting and graphical user interface (GUI). The scripting UI enables the greatest flexibility and allows for most analysis protocols to be replicated. By implementing a novel automated analysis and providing an easy-to-use GUI based on this auto-analysis, the study of dispersion data is much simplified.
Table 1.

Comparison of model support for different dispersion software

SoftwareCPMG-type
-type
CPMGFit
cpmg_fit
CATIA
NESSY
GUARDD
ShereKhan
GLOVE
relax
Comparison of model support for different dispersion software The set-up of the auto-analysis includes defining the molecular system, loading the dispersion data directly from peak lists, clustering atoms with the same kinetics, modifying the list of dispersion models and setting up Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for error propagation. Execution involves sequential optimization of the models, fixed model elimination rules to remove failed models and failed MC simulations increasing both parameter reliability and accuracy (d’Auvergne and Gooley, 2006) and a final run whereby Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) model selection is used to judge statistical significance (Akaike, 1973; d’Auvergne and Gooley, 2003). The optimization is designed for absolute accuracy and robustness, but, as this can take time, it has been parallelized at the spin cluster and the MC simulation level to run on computer clusters using OpenMPI. Three additional methods are used to speed up calculations, all designed to skip the computationally expensive grid search. The first is model nesting—the more complex model starts with the optimized parameters of the simpler. The second is model equivalence—when two models have the same parameters. For example, the CR72 model parameters are used as the starting point for the CPMG numeric models, resulting in a huge computational win. The third is for spin clustering—the analysis starts with the averaged parameter values from a completed non-clustered analysis. The dispersion analysis in relax is implemented in Python using NumPy and the GUI using wxPython. Optimization using the Nelder–Mead simplex and log-barrier constraint algorithms from the minfx library (https://gna.org/projects/minfx/) removes the need for numerical gradient approximations, which add a second numeric layer to the NS models. Data visualization is via the software Grace.
  14 in total

1.  Estimating the time scale of chemical exchange of proteins from measurements of transverse relaxation rates in solution.

Authors:  R Ishima; D A Torchia
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Slow dynamics in folded and unfolded states of an SH3 domain.

Authors:  M Tollinger; N R Skrynnikov; F A Mulder; J D Forman-Kay; L E Kay
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  R1rho relaxation outside of the fast-exchange limit.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  The use of model selection in the model-free analysis of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Edward J d'Auvergne; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data.

Authors:  Edward J d'Auvergne; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  ShereKhan--calculating exchange parameters in relaxation dispersion data from CPMG experiments.

Authors:  Adam Mazur; Björn Hammesfahr; Christian Griesinger; Donghan Lee; Martin Kollmar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Probing chemical shifts of invisible states of proteins with relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: how well can we do?

Authors:  D Flemming Hansen; Pramodh Vallurupalli; Patrik Lundström; Philipp Neudecker; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Direct measurements of the dissociation-rate constant for inhibitor-enzyme complexes via the T1 rho and T2 (CPMG) methods.

Authors:  D G Davis; M E Perlman; R E London
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1994-07

9.  Optimisation of NMR dynamic models I. Minimisation algorithms and their performance within the model-free and Brownian rotational diffusion spaces.

Authors:  Edward J d'Auvergne; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Probing slow dynamics in high molecular weight proteins by methyl-TROSY NMR spectroscopy: application to a 723-residue enzyme.

Authors:  Dmitry M Korzhnev; Karin Kloiber; Voula Kanelis; Vitali Tugarinov; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  18 in total

1.  Non-uniform sampling of NMR relaxation data.

Authors:  Troels E Linnet; Kaare Teilum
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  INFOS: spectrum fitting software for NMR analysis.

Authors:  Albert A Smith
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Aromatic Ring Dynamics, Thermal Activation, and Transient Conformations of a 468 kDa Enzyme by Specific 1H-13C Labeling and Fast Magic-Angle Spinning NMR.

Authors:  Diego F Gauto; Pavel Macek; Alessandro Barducci; Hugo Fraga; Audrey Hessel; Tsutomu Terauchi; David Gajan; Yohei Miyanoiri; Jerome Boisbouvier; Roman Lichtenecker; Masatsune Kainosho; Paul Schanda
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Solution structure of domain 1.1 of the σA factor from Bacillus subtilis is preformed for binding to the RNA polymerase core.

Authors:  Milan Zachrdla; Petr Padrta; Alžbeta Rabatinová; Hana Šanderová; Ivan Barvík; Libor Krásný; Lukáš Žídek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Dissecting Dynamic Allosteric Pathways Using Chemically Related Small-Molecule Activators.

Authors:  George P Lisi; Gregory A Manley; Heidi Hendrickson; Ivan Rivalta; Victor S Batista; J Patrick Loria
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Multi-probe relaxation dispersion measurements increase sensitivity to protein dynamics.

Authors:  R Bryn Fenwick; David Oyen; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Transitions in DNA polymerase β μs-ms dynamics related to substrate binding and catalysis.

Authors:  Eugene F DeRose; Thomas W Kirby; Geoffrey A Mueller; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Robert E London
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Structural Basis of MeCP2 Distribution on Non-CpG Methylated and Hydroxymethylated DNA.

Authors:  M Jeannette Sperlazza; Stephanie M Bilinovich; Leander M Sinanan; Fatima R Javier; David C Williams
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Conformational dynamics are a key factor in signaling mediated by the receiver domain of a sensor histidine kinase from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Olga Otrusinová; Gabriel Demo; Petr Padrta; Zuzana Jaseňáková; Blanka Pekárová; Zuzana Gelová; Agnieszka Szmitkowska; Pavel Kadeřávek; Séverine Jansen; Milan Zachrdla; Tomáš Klumpler; Jaromír Marek; Jozef Hritz; Lubomír Janda; Hideo Iwaï; Michaela Wimmerová; Jan Hejátko; Lukáš Žídek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Allosteric Motions of the CRISPR-Cas9 HNH Nuclease Probed by NMR and Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Kyle W East; Jocelyn C Newton; Uriel N Morzan; Yogesh B Narkhede; Atanu Acharya; Erin Skeens; Gerwald Jogl; Victor S Batista; Giulia Palermo; George P Lisi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.