Literature DB >> 16791734

Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data.

Edward J d'Auvergne1, Paul R Gooley.   

Abstract

Model-free analysis is a technique commonly used within the field of NMR spectroscopy to extract atomic resolution, interpretable dynamic information on multiple timescales from the R1, R2, and steady state NOE. Model-free approaches employ two disparate areas of data analysis, the discipline of mathematical optimisation, specifically the minimisation of a chi2 function, and the statistical field of model selection. By searching through a large number of model-free minimisations, which were setup using synthetic relaxation data whereby the true underlying dynamics is known, certain model-free models have been identified to, at times, fail. This has been characterised as either the internal correlation times, tau(e), tau(f), or tau(s), or the global correlation time parameter, local tau(m), heading towards infinity, the result being that the final parameter values are far from the true values. In a number of cases the minimised chi2 value of the failed model is significantly lower than that of all other models and, hence, will be the model which is chosen by model selection techniques. If these models are not removed prior to model selection the final model-free results could be far from the truth. By implementing a series of empirical rules involving inequalities these models can be specifically isolated and removed. Model-free analysis should therefore consist of three distinct steps: model-free minimisation, model-free model elimination, and finally model-free model selection. Failure has also been identified to affect the individual Monte Carlo simulations used within error analysis. Each simulation involves an independent randomised relaxation data set and model-free minimisation, thus simulations suffer from exactly the same types of failure as model-free models. Therefore, to prevent these outliers from causing a significant overestimation of the errors the failed Monte Carlo simulations need to be culled prior to calculating the parameter standard deviations.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16791734     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-006-9007-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  6 in total

1.  Estimation of dynamic parameters from NMR relaxation data using the Lipari-Szabo model-free approach and Bayesian statistical methods.

Authors:  M Andrec; G T Montelione; R M Levy
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  The use of model selection in the model-free analysis of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Edward J d'Auvergne; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Model-free analysis of protein dynamics: assessment of accuracy and model selection protocols based on molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Jianhan Chen; Charles L Brooks; Peter E Wright
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  The main-chain dynamics of the dynamin pleckstrin homology (PH) domain in solution: analysis of 15N relaxation with monomer/dimer equilibration.

Authors:  D Fushman; S Cahill; D Cowburn
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Gated electron transfers and electron pathways in azurin: a NMR dynamic study at multiple fields and temperatures.

Authors:  Anastasia V Zhuravleva; Dmitry M Korzhnev; Eriks Kupce; Alexander S Arseniev; Martin Billeter; Vladislav Yu Orekhov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Backbone dynamics of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI: correlations with structure and function in an active enzyme.

Authors:  A M Mandel; M Akke; A G Palmer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-02-10       Impact factor: 5.469

  6 in total
  20 in total

1.  Structure, interactions, and dynamics of the RING domain from human TRAF6.

Authors:  Pascal Mercier; Michael J Lewis; D Duong Hau; Linda F Saltibus; Wei Xiao; Leo Spyracopoulos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  TEM-1 backbone dynamics-insights from combined molecular dynamics and nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Olivier Fisette; Sébastien Morin; Pierre-Yves Savard; Patrick Lagüe; Stéphane M Gagné
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  relaxGUI: a new software for fast and simple NMR relaxation data analysis and calculation of ps-ns and μs motion of proteins.

Authors:  Michael Bieri; Edward J d'Auvergne; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Solution structure of domain 1.1 of the σA factor from Bacillus subtilis is preformed for binding to the RNA polymerase core.

Authors:  Milan Zachrdla; Petr Padrta; Alžbeta Rabatinová; Hana Šanderová; Ivan Barvík; Libor Krásný; Lukáš Žídek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A variable light domain fluorogen activating protein homodimerizes to activate dimethylindole red.

Authors:  Nina Senutovitch; Robyn L Stanfield; Shantanu Bhattacharyya; Gordon S Rule; Ian A Wilson; Bruce A Armitage; Alan S Waggoner; Peter B Berget
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Role of Backbone Dynamics in Modulating the Interactions of Disordered Ligands with the TAZ1 Domain of the CREB-Binding Protein.

Authors:  Rebecca B Berlow; Maria A Martinez-Yamout; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  A probe to monitor performance of ¹⁵N longitudinal relaxation experiments for proteins in solution.

Authors:  Rieko Ishima
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Prion proteins with pathogenic and protective mutations show similar structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Sung-Hun Bae; Giuseppe Legname; Ana Serban; Stanley B Prusiner; Peter E Wright; H Jane Dyson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Structural and motional contributions of the Bacillus subtilis ClpC N-domain to adaptor protein interactions.

Authors:  Douglas J Kojetin; Patrick D McLaughlin; Richele J Thompson; David Dubnau; Peter Prepiak; Mark Rance; John Cavanagh
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Optimisation of NMR dynamic models II. A new methodology for the dual optimisation of the model-free parameters and the Brownian rotational diffusion tensor.

Authors:  Edward J d'Auvergne; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.