INTRODUCTION: This contribution presents a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition technique named Tissue Border Enhancement (TBE), whose purpose is to produce images with enhanced visualization of borders between two tissues of interest without any post-processing. METHODS: The technique is based on an inversion recovery sequence that employs an appropriate inversion time to produce images where the interface between two tissues of interest is hypo-intense; therefore, tissue borders are clearly represented by dark lines. This effect is achieved by setting imaging parameters such that two neighboring tissues of interest have magnetization with equal magnitude but opposite sign; therefore, the voxels containing a mixture of each tissue (that is, the tissue interface) possess minimal net signal. The technique was implemented on a 7.0 T MRI system. RESULTS: This approach can assist the definition of tissue borders, such as that between cortical gray matter and white matter; therefore, it could facilitate segmentation procedures, which are often challenging on ultra-high-field systems due to inhomogeneous radiofrequency distribution. TBE allows delineating the contours of structural abnormalities, and its capabilities were demonstrated with patients with focal cortical dysplasia, gray matter heterotopia, and polymicrogyria. CONCLUSION: This technique provides a new type of image contrast and has several possible applications in basic neuroscience, neurogenetic research, and clinical practice, as it could improve the detection power of MRI in the characterization of cortical malformations, enhance the contour of small anatomical structures of interest, and facilitate cortical segmentation.
INTRODUCTION: This contribution presents a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition technique named Tissue Border Enhancement (TBE), whose purpose is to produce images with enhanced visualization of borders between two tissues of interest without any post-processing. METHODS: The technique is based on an inversion recovery sequence that employs an appropriate inversion time to produce images where the interface between two tissues of interest is hypo-intense; therefore, tissue borders are clearly represented by dark lines. This effect is achieved by setting imaging parameters such that two neighboring tissues of interest have magnetization with equal magnitude but opposite sign; therefore, the voxels containing a mixture of each tissue (that is, the tissue interface) possess minimal net signal. The technique was implemented on a 7.0 T MRI system. RESULTS: This approach can assist the definition of tissue borders, such as that between cortical gray matter and white matter; therefore, it could facilitate segmentation procedures, which are often challenging on ultra-high-field systems due to inhomogeneous radiofrequency distribution. TBE allows delineating the contours of structural abnormalities, and its capabilities were demonstrated with patients with focal cortical dysplasia, gray matter heterotopia, and polymicrogyria. CONCLUSION: This technique provides a new type of image contrast and has several possible applications in basic neuroscience, neurogenetic research, and clinical practice, as it could improve the detection power of MRI in the characterization of cortical malformations, enhance the contour of small anatomical structures of interest, and facilitate cortical segmentation.
Authors: Gregor Adriany; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Florian Wiesinger; Steen Moeller; John P Strupp; Peter Andersen; Carl Snyder; Xiaoliang Zhang; Wei Chen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Tommy Vaughan; Kāmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Cornelis A T Van den Berg; Bob van den Bergen; Jeroen B Van de Kamer; Bas W Raaymakers; Hugo Kroeze; Lambertus W Bartels; Jan J W Lagendijk Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kawin Setsompop; Vijayanand Alagappan; Adam C Zelinski; Andreas Potthast; Ulrich Fontius; Franz Hebrank; Franz Schmitt; Lawrence L Wald; Elfar Adalsteinsson Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2008-08-30 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: A James Barkovich; Renzo Guerrini; Ruben I Kuzniecky; Graeme D Jackson; William B Dobyns Journal: Brain Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Mauro Costagli; Mark R Symms; Lorenzo Angeli; Douglas A C Kelley; Laura Biagi; Andrea Farnetani; Catarina Rua; Graziella Donatelli; Gianluigi Tiberi; Michela Tosetti; Mirco Cosottini Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A De Ciantis; A J Barkovich; M Cosottini; C Barba; D Montanaro; M Costagli; M Tosetti; L Biagi; W B Dobyns; R Guerrini Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E Bartolini; M Cosottini; M Costagli; C Barba; L Tassi; R Spreafico; R Garbelli; L Biagi; A Buccoliero; F Giordano; R Guerrini Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Birgit R Plantinga; Yasin Temel; Alard Roebroeck; Kâmil Uludağ; Dimo Ivanov; Mark L Kuijf; Bart M Ter Haar Romenij Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Siegfried Trattnig; Elisabeth Springer; Wolfgang Bogner; Gilbert Hangel; Bernhard Strasser; Barbara Dymerska; Pedro Lima Cardoso; Simon Daniel Robinson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-11-13 Impact factor: 6.556