Literature DB >> 24760826

Natural insertions in rice commonly form tandem duplications indicative of patch-mediated double-strand break induction and repair.

Justin N Vaughn1, Jeffrey L Bennetzen.   

Abstract

The insertion of DNA into a genome can result in the duplication and dispersal of functional sequences through the genome. In addition, a deeper understanding of insertion mechanisms will inform methods of genetic engineering and plant transformation. Exploiting structural variations in numerous rice accessions, we have inferred and analyzed intermediate length (10-1,000 bp) insertions in plants. Insertions in this size class were found to be approximately equal in frequency to deletions, and compound insertion-deletions comprised only 0.1% of all events. Our findings indicate that, as observed in humans, tandem or partially tandem duplications are the dominant form of insertion (48%), although short duplications from ectopic donors account for a sizable fraction of insertions in rice (38%). Many nontandem duplications contain insertions from nearby DNA (within 200 bp) and can contain multiple donor sources--some distant--in single events. Although replication slippage is a plausible explanation for tandem duplications, the end homology required in such a model is most often absent and rarely is >5 bp. However, end homology is commonly longer than expected by chance. Such findings lead us to favor a model of patch-mediated double-strand-break creation followed by nonhomologous end-joining. Additionally, a striking bias toward 31-bp partially tandem duplications suggests that errors in nucleotide excision repair may be resolved via a similar, but distinct, pathway. In summary, the analysis of recent insertions in rice suggests multiple underappreciated causes of structural variation in eukaryotes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  double-strand break repair; structural DNA variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760826      PMCID: PMC4020087          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321854111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Arabidopsis thaliana AtPOLK encodes a DinB-like DNA polymerase that extends mispaired primer termini and is highly expressed in a variety of tissues.

Authors:  Maria Victoria García-Ortiz; Rafael R Ariza; Peter D Hoffman; John B Hays; Teresa Roldán-Arjona
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Patching gaps in plant genomes results in gene movement and erosion of colinearity.

Authors:  Thomas Wicker; Jan P Buchmann; Beat Keller
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Short, local duplications in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Thomas
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Jody M Havener; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Raquel Juárez; Katarzyna Bebenek; Barbara L Kee; Luis Blanco; Thomas A Kunkel; Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes.

Authors:  Xun Xu; Xin Liu; Song Ge; Jeffrey D Jensen; Fengyi Hu; Xin Li; Yang Dong; Ryan N Gutenkunst; Lin Fang; Lei Huang; Jingxiang Li; Weiming He; Guojie Zhang; Xiaoming Zheng; Fumin Zhang; Yingrui Li; Chang Yu; Karsten Kristiansen; Xiuqing Zhang; Jian Wang; Mark Wright; Susan McCouch; Rasmus Nielsen; Jun Wang; Wen Wang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Oxidative DNA damage bypass in Arabidopsis thaliana requires DNA polymerase λ and proliferating cell nuclear antigen 2.

Authors:  Alessandra Amoroso; Lorenzo Concia; Caterina Maggio; Cécile Raynaud; Catherine Bergounioux; Emmanuele Crespan; Rino Cella; Giovanni Maga
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Distribution of short paired duplications in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Thomas; Nathan Srebro; Jonathan Sebat; Nicholas Navin; John Healy; Bud Mishra; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing.

Authors:  Deepak Reyon; Shengdar Q Tsai; Cyd Khayter; Jennifer A Foden; Jeffry D Sander; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; John Aach; P Benjamin Stranges; Kevin M Esvelt; Mark Moosburner; Sriram Kosuri; Luhan Yang; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  17 in total

1.  Birth and Death of LTR-Retrotransposons in Aegilops tauschii.

Authors:  Xiongtao Dai; Hao Wang; Hongye Zhou; Le Wang; Jan Dvořák; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Hans-Georg Müller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Repair of adjacent single-strand breaks is often accompanied by the formation of tandem sequence duplications in plant genomes.

Authors:  Simon Schiml; Friedrich Fauser; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nonhomologous end joining as key to CRISPR/Cas-mediated plant chromosome engineering.

Authors:  Fabienne Gehrke; Angelina Schindele; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Different DNA repair pathways are involved in single-strand break-induced genomic changes in plants.

Authors:  Felix Wolter; Patrick Schindele; Natalja Beying; Armin Scheben; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 12.085

5.  Acquired Flucytosine Resistance during Combination Therapy with Caspofungin and Flucytosine for Candida glabrata Cystitis.

Authors:  Caroline Charlier; Carine El Sissy; Sophie Bachelier-Bassi; Anne Scemla; Gilles Quesne; Emilie Sitterlé; Christophe Legendre; Olivier Lortholary; Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Genetic basis and detection of unintended effects in genetically modified crop plants.

Authors:  Gregory S Ladics; Andrew Bartholomaeus; Phil Bregitzer; Nancy G Doerrer; Alan Gray; Thomas Holzhauser; Mark Jordan; Paul Keese; Esther Kok; Phil Macdonald; Wayne Parrott; Laura Privalle; Alan Raybould; Seung Yon Rhee; Elena Rice; Jörg Romeis; Justin Vaughn; Jean-Michel Wal; Kevin Glenn
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Genetic Analysis of Natural Variation in Antirrhinum Scent Profiles Identifies BENZOIC ACID CARBOXYMETHYL TRANSFERASE As the Major Locus Controlling Methyl Benzoate Synthesis.

Authors:  Victoria Ruiz-Hernández; Benjamin Hermans; Julia Weiss; Marcos Egea-Cortines
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  BRCA1-associated structural variations are a consequence of polymerase theta-mediated end-joining.

Authors:  J A Kamp; R van Schendel; I W Dilweg; M Tijsterman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The impact and origin of copy number variations in the Oryza species.

Authors:  Zetao Bai; Jinfeng Chen; Yi Liao; Meijiao Wang; Rong Liu; Song Ge; Rod A Wing; Mingsheng Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Mutational signatures of non-homologous and polymerase theta-mediated end-joining in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Joost Schimmel; Hanneke Kool; Robin van Schendel; Marcel Tijsterman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.