Literature DB >> 27307441

Repair of adjacent single-strand breaks is often accompanied by the formation of tandem sequence duplications in plant genomes.

Simon Schiml1, Friedrich Fauser1, Holger Puchta2.   

Abstract

Duplication of existing sequences is a major mechanism of genome evolution. It has been previously shown that duplications can occur by replication slippage, unequal sister chromatid exchange, homologous recombination, and aberrant double-strand break-induced synthesis-dependent strand annealing reactions. In a recent study, the abundant presence of short direct repeats was documented by comparative bioinformatics analysis of different rice genomes, and the hypothesis was put forward that such duplications might arise due to the concerted repair of adjacent single-strand breaks (SSBs). Applying the CRISPR/Cas9 technology, we were able to test this hypothesis experimentally in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana Using a Cas9 nickase to induce adjacent genomic SSBs in different regions of the genome (genic, intergenic, and heterochromatic) and at different distances (∼20, 50, and 100 bps), we analyzed the repair outcomes by deep sequencing. In addition to deletions, we regularly detected the formation of direct repeats close to the break sites, independent of the genomic context. The formation of these duplications as well as deletions may be associated with the presence of microhomologies. Most interestingly, we found that even the induction of two SSBs on the same DNA strand can cause genome alterations, albeit at a much lower level. Because such a scenario reflects a natural step during nucleotide excision repair, and given that the germline is set aside only late during development in plants, the repair of adjacent SSBs indeed seems to have an important influence on the shaping of plant genomes during evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas; double-strand break repair; genome editing; homologous recombination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27307441      PMCID: PMC4932966          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603823113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Chie-Yu Lin; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Silvana Konermann; Alexandro E Trevino; David A Scott; Azusa Inoue; Shogo Matoba; Yi Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Short, local duplications in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Thomas
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 3.  The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution.

Authors:  Holger Puchta
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 4.  A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements.

Authors:  Thomas Wicker; François Sabot; Aurélie Hua-Van; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Pierre Capy; Boulos Chalhoub; Andrew Flavell; Philippe Leroy; Michele Morgante; Olivier Panaud; Etienne Paux; Phillip SanMiguel; Alan H Schulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Friedrich Fauser; Simon Schiml; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S J Clough; A F Bent
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Meta-analysis of gross insertions causing human genetic disease: novel mutational mechanisms and the role of replication slippage.

Authors:  Jian-Min Chen; Nadia Chuzhanova; Peter D Stenson; Claude Férec; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  The Functional Topography of the Arabidopsis Genome Is Organized in a Reduced Number of Linear Motifs of Chromatin States.

Authors:  Joana Sequeira-Mendes; Irene Aragüez; Ramón Peiró; Raul Mendez-Giraldez; Xiaoyu Zhang; Steven E Jacobsen; Ugo Bastolla; Crisanto Gutierrez
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Genome-wide kinetics of DNA excision repair in relation to chromatin state and mutagenesis.

Authors:  Sheera Adar; Jinchuan Hu; Jason D Lieb; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences.

Authors:  Jeremy Goecks; Anton Nekrutenko; James Taylor
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  20 in total

1.  Birth and Death of LTR-Retrotransposons in Aegilops tauschii.

Authors:  Xiongtao Dai; Hao Wang; Hongye Zhou; Le Wang; Jan Dvořák; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Hans-Georg Müller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Comparative genomic analysis of the Lipase3 gene family in five plant species reveals distinct evolutionary origins.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Lin Zhang; JunFeng Hu; Dianshuai Gao; Xin Liu; Yan Sha
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Identification of novel HPFH-like mutations by CRISPR base editing that elevate the expression of fetal hemoglobin.

Authors:  Nithin Sam Ravi; Beeke Wienert; Stacia K Wyman; Henry William Bell; Anila George; Gokulnath Mahalingam; Jonathan T Vu; Kirti Prasad; Bhanu Prasad Bandlamudi; Nivedhitha Devaraju; Vignesh Rajendiran; Nazar Syedbasha; Aswin Anand Pai; Yukio Nakamura; Ryo Kurita; Muthuraman Narayanasamy; Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian; Saravanabhavan Thangavel; Srujan Marepally; Shaji R Velayudhan; Alok Srivastava; Mark A DeWitt; Merlin Crossley; Jacob E Corn; Kumarasamypet M Mohankumar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Nonhomologous end joining as key to CRISPR/Cas-mediated plant chromosome engineering.

Authors:  Fabienne Gehrke; Angelina Schindele; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Different DNA repair pathways are involved in single-strand break-induced genomic changes in plants.

Authors:  Felix Wolter; Patrick Schindele; Natalja Beying; Armin Scheben; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 12.085

6.  CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing tools and their possible role in disease resistance mechanism.

Authors:  Diksha Kumari; Bishun Deo Prasad; Padmanabh Dwivedi; Akash Hidangmayum; Sangita Sahni
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Engineering broad-spectrum resistance to cotton leaf curl disease by CRISPR-Cas9 based multiplex editing in plants.

Authors:  Muhammad Salman Mubarik; Xiukang Wang; Sultan Habibullah Khan; Aftab Ahmad; Zulqurnain Khan; Muhammad Waqas Amjid; Muhammad Khuram Razzaq; Zulfiqar Ali; Muhammad Tehseen Azhar
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 8.  New variants of CRISPR RNA-guided genome editing enzymes.

Authors:  Jana Murovec; Žan Pirc; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Boon and Bane of DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 activity in plants, animals and microbes.

Authors:  Luisa Bortesi; Changfu Zhu; Julia Zischewski; Lucia Perez; Ludovic Bassié; Riad Nadi; Giobbe Forni; Sarah Boyd Lade; Erika Soto; Xin Jin; Vicente Medina; Gemma Villorbina; Pilar Muñoz; Gemma Farré; Rainer Fischer; Richard M Twyman; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou; Stefan Schillberg
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 9.803

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.