Literature DB >> 34375428

Different DNA repair pathways are involved in single-strand break-induced genomic changes in plants.

Felix Wolter1, Patrick Schindele1, Natalja Beying1, Armin Scheben2, Holger Puchta1.   

Abstract

In nature, single-strand breaks (SSBs) in DNA occur more frequently (by orders of magnitude) than double-strand breaks (DSBs). SSBs induced by the CRISPR/Cas9 nickase at a distance of 50-100 bp on opposite strands are highly mutagenic, leading to insertions/deletions (InDels), with insertions mainly occurring as direct tandem duplications. As short tandem repeats are overrepresented in plant genomes, this mechanism seems to be important for genome evolution. We investigated the distance at which paired 5'-overhanging SSBs are mutagenic and which DNA repair pathways are essential for insertion formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. We were able to detect InDel formation up to a distance of 250 bp, although with much reduced efficiency. Surprisingly, the loss of the classical nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway factors KU70 or DNA ligase 4 completely abolished tandem repeat formation. The microhomology-mediated NHEJ factor POLQ was required only for patch-like insertions, which are well-known from DSB repair as templated insertions from ectopic sites. As SSBs can also be repaired using homology, we furthermore asked whether the classical homologous recombination (HR) pathway is involved in this process in plants. The fact that RAD54 is not required for homology-mediated SSB repair demonstrates that the mechanisms for DSB- and SSB-induced HR differ in plants. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34375428      PMCID: PMC8566284          DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koab204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   12.085


  77 in total

Review 1.  Role of the BLM helicase in replication fork management.

Authors:  Leonard Wu
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-03-23

2.  Different pathways of homologous recombination are used for the repair of double-strand breaks within tandemly arranged sequences in the plant genome.

Authors:  Nadiya Orel; Anzhela Kyryk; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Interplay between Ku and Replication Protein A in the Restriction of Exo1-mediated DNA Break End Resection.

Authors:  Danielle S Krasner; James M Daley; Patrick Sung; Hengyao Niu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Chromosome end protection by blunt-ended telomeres.

Authors:  Anita Kazda; Barbara Zellinger; Max Rössler; Elisa Derboven; Branislav Kusenda; Karel Riha
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S J Clough; A F Bent
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Distinct genetic control of homologous recombination repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks, nicks and paired nicks.

Authors:  Lianne E M Vriend; Rohit Prakash; Chun-Chin Chen; Fabio Vanoli; Francesca Cavallo; Yu Zhang; Maria Jasin; Przemek M Krawczyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  DNA Base Excision Repair in Plants: An Unfolding Story With Familiar and Novel Characters.

Authors:  Teresa Roldán-Arjona; Rafael R Ariza; Dolores Córdoba-Cañero
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  In vitro role of Rad54 in Rad51-ssDNA filament-dependent homology search and synaptic complexes formation.

Authors:  Eliana Moreira Tavares; William Douglass Wright; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer; Eric Le Cam; Pauline Dupaigne
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Novel approach reveals genomic landscapes of single-strand DNA breaks with nucleotide resolution in human cells.

Authors:  Huifen Cao; Lorena Salazar-García; Fan Gao; Thor Wahlestedt; Chun-Lin Wu; Xueer Han; Ye Cai; Dongyang Xu; Fang Wang; Lu Tang; Natalie Ricciardi; DingDing Cai; Huifang Wang; Mario P S Chin; James A Timmons; Claes Wahlestedt; Philipp Kapranov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition.

Authors:  Eva K Brinkman; Tao Chen; Mario Amendola; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nonhomologous end joining as key to CRISPR/Cas-mediated plant chromosome engineering.

Authors:  Fabienne Gehrke; Angelina Schindele; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  TEB/POLQ plays dual roles in protecting Arabidopsis from NO-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Qiang Lv; Shuang Han; Lei Wang; Jinchan Xia; Peng Li; Ruoyang Hu; Jinzheng Wang; Lei Gao; Yuli Chen; Yu Wang; Jing Du; Fang Bao; Yong Hu; Xingzhi Xu; Wei Xiao; Yikun He
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 19.160

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.