Literature DB >> 24757355

Evaluation of Bone Density Around the Implants Placed Using Drilling Technique and Bone Expansion Technique: An In vivo Study.

G V K Mohan Reddy1, C H Vamsi Krishna1, S Lakshmi2, Venkat Aditya1, N Chandra Sekhar1, Y Mahadev Shastry1.   

Abstract

Bone density is a key parameter in determining the surgical procedure of implant placement and for the predictability of successful implant treatment. Several clinical studies have shown lower survival rates of implants in maxilla which was attributed to poor bone quality. The present study compared the variations in the pre-operative and post-operative bone density values in Hounsfield units using CT between drilling technique and bone expansion technique at 0.25 and 1.0 mm sections at two sites which were selected in maxillary arch between the second premolar regions of either quadrants and results have shown bone expansion technique is superior to drilling technique in division III bone.

Keywords:  Bone density; Bone expansion; Dental CT; Osteotomes

Year:  2013        PMID: 24757355      PMCID: PMC3990776          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0304-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  13 in total

1.  Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.

Authors:  M R Norton; C Gamble
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible.

Authors:  Andreas Beer; André Gahleitner; Anders Holm; Manfred Tschabitscher; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.

Authors:  Tomomi Hanazawa; Tsukasa Sano; Kenji Seki; Tomohiro Okano
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Implant placement in the maxillary tuberosity: the Summers' technique performed with modified osteotomes.

Authors:  P F Nocini; M Albanese; A Fior; D De Santis
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index.

Authors:  Tannaz Shapurian; Petros D Damoulis; Gary M Reiser; Terrence J Griffin; William M Rand
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone.

Authors:  Mete I Fanuscu; Ting-Ling Chang; Kivanç Akça
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 7.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  The modified osteotome technique.

Authors:  M Davarpanah; H Martinez; J F Tecucianu; G Hage; R Lazzara
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses.

Authors:  B Friberg; T Jemt; U Lekholm
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz; Celal Tumer; Esma Nida Ozbek; Tolga F Tözüm
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.