Literature DB >> 15008935

Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.

Tomomi Hanazawa1, Tsukasa Sano, Kenji Seki, Tomohiro Okano.   

Abstract

This study was carried out to compare the accuracy of determination of the mandibular contour and the position of the mandibular canal in cadaver mandibles by the multiplanar reconstruction method (MPR-CT), which has recently come to be used widely for preoperative examinations, with those by tomographic techniques and to evaluate the usefulness of MPR-CT. Using three imaging systems, i.e. Quantum CT scanner, Scanora, and OP-100, a total of 6 sites were scanned in the molar regions of 3 cadaver mandibles. The images obtained were measured twice each by 4 radiologists. The anatomic structures measured were the height and thickness of the mandible, distance from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal, and distance from the buccal cortical bone to the mandibular canal. After scanning, the scanned areas of the mandibles were sliced at a thickness of 2 mm, and soft X-ray images of these slices were obtained. The values of the above 4 anatomic structures obtained by measurements in the soft X-ray radiograms using digital-display calipers were regarded as true values. When compared with the true values, the errors in the distance from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal were within 1 mm (+/- 1 mm) in 93.7% of the measurements by Direct-CT, 89.6% of the measurements by MPR-CT, 87.5% of the measurements by Scanora, and 47.9% of the measurements by OP-100, and the accuracy of the 4 methods ranked in the order of Direct-CT, MPR-CT, Scanora, and OP-100. A similar tendency was observed in the measurements of other anatomic structures, and statistically significant differences were observed among the methods. Thus, MPR-CT allows more accurate measurements than by the other 2 tomographic techniques,and to be useful as a preoperative examination for implant surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15008935     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00991.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  17 in total

1.  The effects of location of alveolar crest on the vertical bone heights on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  S-M Lee; S-S Lee; K-H Huh; W-J Yi; M-S Heo; S-C Choi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Watanabe; Momin Mohammad Abdul; Tohru Kurabayashi; Hideki Aoki
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Course and Position of Mandibular Canal.

Authors:  Hooman Khorshidi; Saeed Raoofi; Janan Ghapanchi; Shoaleh Shahidi; Maryam Paknahad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-09

4.  Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: a CT investigation.

Authors:  Marcello Rodrigues de Oliveira Júnior; André Luis Santos Saud; Debora Rodrigues Fonseca; Bernardo De-Ary-Pires; Mário Ary Pires-Neto; Ricardo de Ary-Pires
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.

Authors:  Selda Yildiz; Gurkan Rasit Bayar; Inanc Guvenc; Necdet Kocabiyik; Ayhan Cömert; Fatih Yazar
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Evaluation of Bone Density Around the Implants Placed Using Drilling Technique and Bone Expansion Technique: An In vivo Study.

Authors:  G V K Mohan Reddy; C H Vamsi Krishna; S Lakshmi; Venkat Aditya; N Chandra Sekhar; Y Mahadev Shastry
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-08-04

7.  Available bone morphology and status of neural structures in the mandibular interforaminal region: three-dimensional analysis of anatomical structures.

Authors:  Duygu Goller Bulut; Emre Köse
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Correlation between coronal and apical arch form and degree of divergence: a volumetric computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  L Lombardo; F Veronesi; V Candotto; M Nardone; G Siciliani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

9.  Evaluation of mandibular cortical bone thickness for placement of temporary anchorage devices (TADs).

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Kim; Young-Chel Park
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  The effect of mandibular buccal tilting on the accuracy of posterior mandibular spiral tomographic images: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mahnaz Sheikhi; Vida Maleki
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.