Literature DB >> 24756453

Early experience of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: review of surgical outcomes relative to alternative approaches.

Talar B Kharadjian1, Surena F Matin, Curtis A Pettaway.   

Abstract

Inguinal lymph node dissection is a diagnostic and potentially curative treatment for penile carcinoma, which has historically been associated with high morbidity rates. This review summarizes the initial outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAIL) compared with the outcomes of the standard open and endoscopic approaches. The early experience suggests that RAIL may yield comparable oncologic outcomes, although future prospective studies of RAIL with greater numbers of participants and long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the incidence and severity of perioperative and postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24756453     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-014-0412-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  20 in total

1.  Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Carlos Arturo Levi d'Ancona; Roberto Gonçalves de Lucena; Fernando Augusto de Oliveira Querne; Mário Henrique Tavares Martins; Fernandes Denardi; Nelson Rodrigues Netto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.

Authors:  Kai Yao; Hua Tu; Yong-Hong Li; Zi-Ke Qin; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Fang-Jian Zhou; Hui Han
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Port site metastases after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Nasr A El-Tabey; Ahmed M Shoma
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Functional, oncologic, and technical outcomes after endoscopic groin dissection for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel J Canter; Ryan W Dobbs; S Mohammed A Jafri; Lindsey A Herrel; Kenneth Ogan; Keith A Delman; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 5.  Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications.

Authors:  Philippe E Spiess; Mike S Hernandez; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Surena F Matin; Janice N Cormier; John F Ward; Louis L Pisters; Christopher G Wood; Colin P N Dinney; Richard E Royal; Xuelin Huang; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma and genital malignancy: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Xue-Lu Zhou; Ji-Feng Zhang; Jian-Feng Zhang; Shang-Jun Zhou; Xiao-Qiang Yuan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?

Authors:  Marcos Tobias-Machado; Alessandro Tavares; Matheus Neves Ribeiro Silva; Wilson Rica Molina; Pedro Hermínio Forseto; Roberto Vaz Juliano; Eric Roger Wroclawski
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Two-center evaluation of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; Ben Hughes; Niels M Graafland; Bin K Kroon; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Omgo E Nieweg; Cathy Corbishley; Sue Heenan; Nick Watkin; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Robotic-assisted inguinal lymph node dissection: A preliminary report.

Authors:  P N Dogra; Ashish Kumar Saini; Prabhjot Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gkegkes; Evelyn Eleni Minis; Christos Iavazzo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-05

Review 2.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Penile squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature and case report treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth Marchionne; Caroline Perez; Andrea Hui; Amor Khachemoune
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

4.  The possible role of the da Vinci robot for patients with vulval carcinoma undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Paraskevi Evangelia Iavazzo; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2017-04-06

Review 5.  Technical considerations to minimize complications of inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Manik K Gupta; Amar P Patel; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

6.  Saphenous-sparing Ascending Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Using a Leg Approach: Surgical Technique and Perioperative and Pathological Outcomes.

Authors:  Christian D Fankhauser; Esther W C Lee; Allaudin Issa; Pedro Oliveira; Maurice Lau; Vijay Sangar; Arie Parnham
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-11-18

7.  A single-center comparison of our initial experiences in treating penile and urethral cancer with video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and later experiences in melanoma cases.

Authors:  A Gómez-Ferrer; A Collado; M Ramírez; J Domínguez; J Casanova; C Mir; A Wong; J L Marenco; E Nagore; V Soriano; J Rubio-Briones
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-26

Review 8.  The age of robotic surgery - Is laparoscopy dead?

Authors:  Hartwig Schwaibold; Felix Wiesend; Christian Bach
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-07-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.