Literature DB >> 28401957

Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Andrew Leone1, Gregory J Diorio1, Curtis Pettaway2, Viraj Master3, Philippe E Spiess1.   

Abstract

Penile cancer is a rare disease that causes considerable physical and psychological patient morbidity, especially at advanced stages. Patients with low-stage nodal metastasis can achieve durable survival with surgery alone, but those with extensive locoregional metastasis have overall low survival. Contemporary management strategies for lymph node involvement in penile cancer aim to minimize the morbidity associated with traditional radical inguinal lymphadenectomy through appropriate risk stratification while optimizing oncological outcomes. Modified (or superficial) inguinal lymph node dissection and dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy are diagnostic modalities that have been recommended in patients with high-risk primary penile tumours and nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes. In addition, advances in minimally invasive and robot-assisted lymphadenectomy techniques are being investigated in patients with penile cancer and might further decrease lymphadenectomy-related adverse effects. The management of patients with advanced disease has evolved to include multimodal treatment with systemic chemotherapy before surgical intervention and can include adjuvant chemotherapy after pelvic lymphadenectomy. The role of radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting remains largely unclear, owing to a lack of high-level evidence of possible benefits. New targeted therapies have shown efficacy in squamous cell carcinomas of other sites and might also prove effective in patients with penile cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28401957     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  123 in total

Review 1.  Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection.

Authors:  S Horenblas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009.

Authors:  Giorgio Pizzocaro; Ferran Algaba; Simon Horenblas; Eduard Solsona; Silvia Tana; Hein Van Der Poel; Nicholas A Watkin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Richard Bevan-Thomas; Joel W Slaton; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  R Ravi
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-12

5.  EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update.

Authors:  Oliver W Hakenberg; Eva M Compérat; Suks Minhas; Andrea Necchi; Chris Protzel; Nick Watkin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Prognostic factors in penile cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Bulent Akduman; Olivier Bouchot; Joan Palou; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a prospective study of the long-term outcome of 500 inguinal basins assessed at a single institution.

Authors:  Wayne Lam; Hussain M Alnajjar; Susannah La-Touche; Matthew Perry; Davendra Sharma; Cathy Corbishley; James Pilcher; Sue Heenan; Nick Watkin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Management of clinically node negative penile carcinoma: improved survival after the introduction of dynamic sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  A P Lont; S Horenblas; P J Tanis; M P Gallee; H van Tinteren; O E Nieweg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Brazilian National Cancer Institute long-term experience.

Authors:  Antonio Augusto Ornellas; Eduardo Wei Kinchin; Bernardo Lindenberg Braga Nóbrega; Aristóteles Wisnescky; Nelson Koifman; Raul Quirino
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion.

Authors:  W S McDougal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy.

Authors:  George Coba; Trushar Patel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Patterns of Treatment and Outcomes in Older Men With Penile Cancer: A SEER Dataset Analysis.

Authors:  Maria T Bourlon; Haydee Verduzco-Aguirre; Elizabeth Molina; Elisabeth Meyer; Elizabeth Kessler; Simon P Kim; Philippe E Spiess; Thomas Flaig
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  The relationship between HPV status and chemoradiotherapy in the locoregional control of penile cancer.

Authors:  Zhigang Yuan; Arash O Naghavi; Dominic Tang; Youngchul Kim; Kamran A Ahmed; Jasreman Dhillon; Anna R Giuliano; Philippe E Spiess; Peter A Johnstone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Histological subtype is a significant predictor for inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin-You Wang; Ming-Zhu Gao; De-Xin Yu; Dong-Dong Xie; Yi Wang; Liang-Kuan Bi; Tao Zhang; De-Mao Ding
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Nomograms to predict the presence and extent of inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile cancer patients with clinically positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Yan Zhong; Lebin Song; Yamin Wang; Yichun Wang; Qijie Zhang; Rong Cong; Chengjian Ji; Tongfu Yu; Ninghong Song
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

Review 6.  Robot-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: A review of current outcomes.

Authors:  Gilberto José Rodrigues; Giuliano Betoni Guglielmetti; Marcelo Orvieto; Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat; Vipul R Patel; Rafael Ferreira Coelho
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-08-26

7.  Molecular stratification by BCL2A1 and AIM2 provides additional prognostic value in penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xingliang Tan; Dong Chen; Shengjie Guo; Yanjun Wang; Yuantao Zou; Zhiming Wu; Fangjian Zhou; Zike Qin; Zhuowei Liu; Yun Cao; Chunhua Lin; Gangjun Yuan; Kai Yao
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Pan Gao; Tianle Zhu; Jingjing Gao; Hu Li; Xi Liu; Xiansheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  The role of perineural invasion in penile cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Feng Qi; Ruhua Zhou; Shangqian Wang; Yamin Wang; Yi Wang; Chen Chen; Yichun Wang; Jie Yang; Ninghong Song
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 10.  Detection of lymph node metastases in penile cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bloom; Michael Stern; Neel H Patel; Michael Zhang; John L Phillips
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.