Literature DB >> 15247713

Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Carlos Arturo Levi d'Ancona1, Roberto Gonçalves de Lucena, Fernando Augusto de Oliveira Querne, Mário Henrique Tavares Martins, Fernandes Denardi, Nelson Rodrigues Netto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated modified inguinal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of penile carcinoma, analyzing the rate of complications compared to complete inguinal lymphadenectomy, the complications in performing lymphadenectomy and penectomy concomitantly, and the long-term locoregional recurrence rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 26 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis were clinically assessed, and underwent penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy at the same operative time. Frozen section analysis of lymph nodes was performed and if metastases were detected a complete ipsilateral inguinal dissection was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 52 modified lymphadenectomies were performed. In 10 procedures lymph node metastasis was present. Clinical staging presented false-positive and false-negative rates of 50% and 7.9%, respectively. The complication rate for modified lymphadenectomy was 38.9% and for complete inguinal lymphadenectomy it was 87.5%. Followup ranged from 5 to 112 months and mean followup of recurrence-free cases was 78 months (range 38 to 112). A total of 18 patients underwent bilateral negative modified inguinal lymphadenectomy and 2 of these experienced locoregional recurrence within 2 years after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy causes a lower complication rate than complete inguinal lymphadenectomy. Bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy performed at the same time as penectomy does not increase the complication rate. When frozen section analysis is negative bilaterally, 5.5% of inguinal regions might still harbor occult metastasis. Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy is recommended as a staging procedure in all patients with T2-3 penile carcinoma. A straight followup is required for 2 years since all recurrence was within this period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15247713     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132239.28989.e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL): Minimally Invasive Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Technique.

Authors:  Rawal Sudhir; Raghunath S Krishnappa; Samir Khanna; R Sekon; Rakesh Koul
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-04

Review 3.  Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer.

Authors:  Ben Hughes; Joost Leijte; Majid Shabbir; Nick Watkin; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Feasibility of performing dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as a delayed procedure in penile cancer.

Authors:  Savvas Omorphos; Zia Saad; Manit Arya; Alex Freeman; Peter Malone; Raj Nigam; Jamshed Bomanji; Asif Muneer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Early experience of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: review of surgical outcomes relative to alternative approaches.

Authors:  Talar B Kharadjian; Surena F Matin; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: an initial experience in an Irish Hospital.

Authors:  P E Lonergan; A Nic An Riogh; F O'Kelly; D J Lundon; D O'Sullivan; M O'Connell; P K Hegarty
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  [The influence of the T stage on the risk of metastasis of penis cancer: T1 vs. T2].

Authors:  C M Naumann; C van der Horst; B Volkmer; F Kurtz; F J Martinéz Portillo; C Seif; S Hautmann; P M Braun; R Hautmann; K-P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Extra-anatomical transobturator bypass graft for femoral artery involvement by metastatic carcinoma of the penis: report of five patients.

Authors:  Ubirajara Ferreira; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Lia Yumi Ikari; Walter da Silva; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Fernandes Denardi; Rafael Mamprim Stopiglia; Fábio Husseman Menezes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [Sentinel lymph node biopsy for penile carcinoma : Assessment of reliability].

Authors:  J Fuchs; M F Hamann; F Schulenburg; S Knüpfer; D Osmonov; U Lützen; K-P Jünemann; C M Naumann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Modified Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Groin-Negative Patients of Penile Cancer: Our Experience.

Authors:  R B Nerli; Manas Sharma; Priyeshkumar Patel; Shridhar C Ghagane; Shashank D Patil; Pulkit Gupta; Murigendra B Hiremath; Neeraj S Dixit
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.