Literature DB >> 19414668

Two-center evaluation of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Joost A P Leijte1, Ben Hughes, Niels M Graafland, Bin K Kroon, Renato A Valdés Olmos, Omgo E Nieweg, Cathy Corbishley, Sue Heenan, Nick Watkin, Simon Horenblas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sentinel node biopsy is used to evaluate the nodal status of patients with clinically node-negative penile carcinoma. Its use is not widespread, and the majority of patients with clinically node-negative disease undergo an elective inguinal lymph node dissection. Reservations about the use of sentinel node biopsy include the fact that most current results come from one institution and the supposedly long learning curve associated with the procedure. The purpose of this study was to address these issues by analyzing results from two centers and by evaluating the learning curve. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy for penile carcinoma at two centers were included. The sentinel node identification rate, false-negative rate, and morbidity of the procedure were calculated.
RESULTS: from the first 30 procedures were assessed for a potential learning curve. Results A total of 323 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma, which included 611 clinically node-negative groins, were scheduled for sentinel node biopsy. A sentinel node was found in 572 of the 592 groins (97%) that proceeded to sentinel node biopsy. In 79 groins, a sentinel node was positive for tumor. Six inguinal node recurrences occurred after a negative sentinel node procedure, all within 15 months after sentinel node biopsy. The combined false-negative rate was 7%. Complications occurred in 4.7% of explored groins. None of the false-negative procedures occurred in the initial 30 procedures.
CONCLUSION: Sentinel node biopsy is a suitable procedure to stage clinically node-negative penile cancer, and it has a low complication rate. No learning curve was demonstrated in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19414668     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  29 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Defining the role of modern imaging techniques in assessing lymph nodes for metastasis in cancer: evolving contribution of PET in this setting.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Drew A Torigian; Babak Saboury; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Feasibility of performing dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as a delayed procedure in penile cancer.

Authors:  Savvas Omorphos; Zia Saad; Manit Arya; Alex Freeman; Peter Malone; Raj Nigam; Jamshed Bomanji; Asif Muneer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Early experience of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: review of surgical outcomes relative to alternative approaches.

Authors:  Talar B Kharadjian; Surena F Matin; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Making surgery safer by centralization of care: impact of case load in penile cancer.

Authors:  Joren Vanthoor; Anita Thomas; Igor Tsaur; Maarten Albersen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Radiocolloid-based dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer with clinically negative inguinal lymph node: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zi-Jun Zou; Zhi-Hong Liu; Liang-You Tang; Yu-Jie Wang; Jia-Yu Liang; Ruo-Cheng Zhang; Yong-Quan Tang; Yi-Ping Lu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  [Diagnostic work-up for lymph node metastases of urological tumors].

Authors:  M Seitz; M Bader; F Strittmatter; C Gratzke; D Tilki; A Roosen; B Schlenker; O Reich; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Safety of excisional inguinal lymph node biopsies performed for research purposes in HIV-1-infected women and men.

Authors:  Amie L Meditz; Elizabeth Connick; Martin McCarter
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.150

10.  Lymph node metastases and prognosis in penile cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.