Literature DB >> 29730734

Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review.

Ioannis D Gkegkes1, Evelyn Eleni Minis2, Christos Iavazzo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenectomy represents the standard treatment for various types of cancer. The introduction of robotics in lymph node dissection may have an important impact on post-lymphadenectomy complications.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed.
RESULTS: In our review, robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed on 51 patients. Penile squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological type of the primary neoplasia. No intra-operative complications were reported. One case of conversion to open was reported. The mean duration of hospitalization was 2 days. The duration of drainage ranged from 7 to 72 days. The most common postoperative complications were lymphocele (13.7%), lymphedema (7.8%), cellulitis (7.8%), seroma (3.9%), abscess (3.9%), wound breakdown/wound infection (3.9%), sepsis (1.9%), prolonged lymphorrhea (1 out of 51 patients, 1.9%) and skin necrosis (1 out of 51 patients, 1.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Until now there has not been sufficient evidence regarding the role of robotics in groin lymph node dissection, though this approach appears to be safe and oncologically effective, with morbidity rates relatively lower compared to open surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Da Vinci®; Groin dissection; Inguinal; Lymphadenectomy; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730734     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0823-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  20 in total

1.  Sentinel Lymph Node Detection With the Use of Intradermal Microbubbles in Vulvar Cancer.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.

Authors:  Kai Yao; Hua Tu; Yong-Hong Li; Zi-Ke Qin; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Fang-Jian Zhou; Hui Han
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Early experience of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: review of surgical outcomes relative to alternative approaches.

Authors:  Talar B Kharadjian; Surena F Matin; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Rene Sotelo; Omaira Rodriguez; Renata Sánchez; José Rosciano; Luis Medina; Liumariel Vegas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-12

Review 5.  Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Ioannis Mamais; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): initial case report and comparison with open radical procedure.

Authors:  Marcos Tobias-Machado; Alessandro Tavares; Wilson R Molina; João Paulo Zambon; Jimmy Angel Medina; Pedro H Forseto; Roberto V Juliano; Eric R Wroclawski
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.436

7.  Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.

Authors:  Martijn M Stuiver; Rosa S Djajadiningrat; Niels M Graafland; Andrew D Vincent; Cees Lucas; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Robotic-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  David Y Josephson; Kenneth M Jacobsohn; Brian A Link; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Rene Sotelo; Rafael Sánchez-Salas; Oswaldo Carmona; Alejandro Garcia; Mirandolino Mariano; Gilvan Neiva; Gustavo Trujillo; John Novoa; Francisco Cornejo; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Jiasian Teh; Catriona Duncan; Liang Qu; Glen Guerra; Vignesh Narasimhan; Toan Pham; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

2.  Saphenous-sparing Ascending Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Using a Leg Approach: Surgical Technique and Perioperative and Pathological Outcomes.

Authors:  Christian D Fankhauser; Esther W C Lee; Allaudin Issa; Pedro Oliveira; Maurice Lau; Vijay Sangar; Arie Parnham
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-11-18

3.  Clinical Application of Noninflating Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection.

Authors:  Jinhu Chen; Lei Yan; Guangyue Luo; Weihua Fang; Chaozhao Liang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: preliminary experience and perioperative outcomes from an Italian referral center.

Authors:  Gabriele Cozzi; Gennaro Musi; Matteo Ferro; Pierpaolo Prestianni; Roberto Bianchi; Garelli Giulia; Mistretta Francesco Alessandro; Stefano Luzzago; Elisabetta Pennacchioli; Ottavio de Cobelli
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2020-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.