Literature DB >> 24753598

Beyond the single gene: How epistasis and gene-by-environment effects influence crop domestication.

Andrew N Doust1, Lewis Lukens, Kenneth M Olsen, Margarita Mauro-Herrera, Ann Meyer, Kimberly Rogers.   

Abstract

Domestication is a multifaceted evolutionary process, involving changes in individual genes, genetic interactions, and emergent phenotypes. There has been extensive discussion of the phenotypic characteristics of plant domestication, and recent research has started to identify the specific genes and mutational mechanisms that control domestication traits. However, there is an apparent disconnect between the simple genetic architecture described for many crop domestication traits, which should facilitate rapid phenotypic change under selection, and the slow rate of change reported from the archeobotanical record. A possible explanation involves the middle ground between individual genetic changes and their expression during development, where gene-by-gene (epistatic) and gene-by-environment interactions can modify the expression of phenotypes and opportunities for selection. These aspects of genetic architecture have the potential to significantly slow the speed of phenotypic evolution during crop domestication and improvement. Here we examine whether epistatic and gene-by-environment interactions have shaped how domestication traits have evolved. We review available evidence from the literature, and we analyze two domestication-related traits, shattering and flowering time, in a mapping population derived from a cross between domesticated foxtail millet and its wild progenitor. We find that compared with wild progenitor alleles, those favored during domestication often have large phenotypic effects and are relatively insensitive to genetic background and environmental effects. Consistent selection should thus be able to rapidly change traits during domestication. We conclude that if phenotypic evolution was slow during crop domestication, this is more likely due to cultural or historical factors than epistatic or environmental constraints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G × E; QTL; Setaria; domestication syndrome; genotype-by-environment interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24753598      PMCID: PMC4035984          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308940110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

Review 1.  Genome relationships: the grass model in current research.

Authors:  K M Devos; M D Gale
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  The role of epistatic gene interactions in the response to selection and the evolution of evolvability.

Authors:  Ashley J R Carter; Joachim Hermisson; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  How fast was wild wheat domesticated?

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Tanno; George Willcox
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effect of genotype and environment on branching in weedy green millet (Setaria viridis) and domesticated foxtail millet (Setaria italica) (Poaceae).

Authors:  Andrew N Doust; Elizabeth A Kellogg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  The molecular genetics of crop domestication.

Authors:  John F Doebley; Brandon S Gaut; Bruce D Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Genetic analysis of adaptive syndromes interrelated with seed dormancy in weedy rice (Oryza sativa).

Authors:  Xing-You Gu; Shahryar F Kianian; Gary A Hareland; Barry L Hoffer; Michael E Foley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) east of the Fertile Crescent.

Authors:  Peter L Morrell; Michael T Clegg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Rice domestication by reducing shattering.

Authors:  Changbao Li; Ailing Zhou; Tao Sang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte.

Authors:  Lauren Hubbard; Paula McSteen; John Doebley; Sarah Hake
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World.

Authors:  Dorian Q Fuller
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.357

View more
  26 in total

1.  Ascochyta blight disease of pea (Pisum sativum L.): defence-related candidate genes associated with QTL regions and identification of epistatic QTL.

Authors:  Gail M Timmerman-Vaughan; Leire Moya; Tonya J Frew; Sarah R Murray; Ross Crowhurst
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  The importance of genomic variation for biodiversity, ecosystems and people.

Authors:  Madlen Stange; Rowan D H Barrett; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies.

Authors:  Greger Larson; Dolores R Piperno; Robin G Allaby; Michael D Purugganan; Leif Andersson; Manuel Arroyo-Kalin; Loukas Barton; Cynthia Climer Vigueira; Tim Denham; Keith Dobney; Andrew N Doust; Paul Gepts; M Thomas P Gilbert; Kristen J Gremillion; Leilani Lucas; Lewis Lukens; Fiona B Marshall; Kenneth M Olsen; J Chris Pires; Peter J Richerson; Rafael Rubio de Casas; Oris I Sanjur; Mark G Thomas; Dorian Q Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A Chromosome Segment Substitution Library of Weedy Rice for Genetic Dissection of Complex Agronomic and Domestication Traits.

Authors:  Prasanta K Subudhi; Teresa De Leon; Pradeep K Singh; Arnold Parco; Marc A Cohn; Takuji Sasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Microsatellite Variations of Elite Setaria Varieties Released during Last Six Decades in China.

Authors:  Guanqing Jia; Xiaotong Liu; James C Schnable; Zhengang Niu; Chunfang Wang; Yuhui Li; Shujun Wang; Suying Wang; Jinrong Liu; Erhu Guo; Hui Zhi; Xianmin Diao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sequence and expression variations suggest an adaptive role for the DA1-like gene family in the evolution of soybeans.

Authors:  Man Zhao; Yongzhe Gu; Lingli He; Qingshan Chen; Chaoying He
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Assembling the Setaria italica L. Beauv. genome into nine chromosomes and insights into regions affecting growth and drought tolerance.

Authors:  Kevin J Tsai; Mei-Yeh Jade Lu; Kai-Jung Yang; Mengyun Li; Yuchuan Teng; Shihmay Chen; Maurice S B Ku; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Setaria: A Food Crop and Translational Research Model for C4 Grasses.

Authors:  Shankar R Pant; Sonia Irigoyen; Andrew N Doust; Karen Beth G Scholthof; Kranthi K Mandadi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  From network to phenotype: the dynamic wiring of an Arabidopsis transcriptional network induced by osmotic stress.

Authors:  Lisa Van den Broeck; Marieke Dubois; Mattias Vermeersch; Veronique Storme; Minami Matsui; Dirk Inzé
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Domesticated, Genetically Engineered, and Wild Plant Relatives Exhibit Unintended Phenotypic Differences: A Comparative Meta-Analysis Profiling Rice, Canola, Maize, Sunflower, and Pumpkin.

Authors:  Alejandra Hernández-Terán; Ana Wegier; Mariana Benítez; Rafael Lira; Ana E Escalante
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.