Literature DB >> 16122771

The role of epistatic gene interactions in the response to selection and the evolution of evolvability.

Ashley J R Carter1, Joachim Hermisson, Thomas F Hansen.   

Abstract

It has been argued that the architecture of the genotype-phenotype map determines evolvability, but few studies have attempted to quantify these effects. In this article we use the multilinear epistatic model to study the effects of different forms of epistasis on the response to directional selection. We derive an analytical prediction for the change in the additive genetic variance, and use individual-based simulations to understand the dynamics of evolvability and the evolution of genetic architecture. This shows that the major determinant for the evolution of the additive variance, and thus the evolvability, is directional epistasis. Positive directional epistasis leads to an acceleration of evolvability, while negative directional epistasis leads to canalization. In contrast, pure non-directional epistasis has little effect on the response to selection. One consequence of this is that the classical epistatic variance components, which do not distinguish directional and non-directional effects, are useless as predictors of evolutionary dynamics. The build-up of linkage disequilibrium also has negligible effects. We argue that directional epistasis is likely to have major effects on evolutionary dynamics and should be the focus of empirical studies of epistasis.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16122771     DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  53 in total

1.  Evolution of adaptive phenotypic variation patterns by direct selection for evolvability.

Authors:  Mihaela Pavlicev; James M Cheverud; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Naturally segregating loci exhibit epistasis for fitness.

Authors:  Patrick J Monnahan; John K Kelly
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  On the evolution of epistasis II: a generalized Wright-Kimura framework.

Authors:  Uri Liberman; Amit Puniyani; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  A unified model for functional and statistical epistasis and its application in quantitative trait Loci analysis.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.

Authors:  Michael M Desai; Daniel Weissman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The evolution of genetic architectures underlying quantitative traits.

Authors:  Etienne Rajon; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The frequency of fitness peak shifts is increased at expanding range margins due to mutation surfing.

Authors:  Olivia J Burton; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Something old and something new: wedding recombinant inbred lines with traditional line cross analysis increases power to describe gene interactions.

Authors:  Tarek W Elnaccash; Stephen J Tonsor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A developmental systems perspective on epistasis: computational exploration of mutational interactions in model developmental regulatory networks.

Authors:  Jayson Gutiérrez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.