Literature DB >> 26801334

Ascochyta blight disease of pea (Pisum sativum L.): defence-related candidate genes associated with QTL regions and identification of epistatic QTL.

Gail M Timmerman-Vaughan1, Leire Moya2, Tonya J Frew2, Sarah R Murray2, Ross Crowhurst3.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Advances have been made in our understanding of Ascochyta blight resistance genetics through mapping candidate genes associated with QTL regions and demonstrating the importance of epistatic interactions in determining resistance. Ascochyta blight disease of pea (Pisum sativum L.) is economically significant with worldwide distribution. The causal pathogens are Didymella pinodes, Phoma medicaginis var pinodella and, in South Australia, P. koolunga. This study aimed to identify candidate genes that map to quantitative trait loci (QTL) for Ascochyta blight field disease resistance and to explore the role of epistatic interactions. Candidate genes associated with QTL were identified beginning with 101 defence-related genes from the published literature. Synteny between pea and Medicago truncatula was used to narrow down the candidates for mapping. Fourteen pea candidate sequences were mapped in two QTL mapping populations, A26 × Rovar and A88 × Rovar. QTL peaks, or the intervals containing QTL peaks, for the Asc2.1, Asc4.2, Asc4.3 and Asc7.1 QTL were defined by four of these candidate genes, while another three candidate genes occurred within 1.0 LOD confidence intervals. Epistasis involving QTL × background marker and background marker × background marker interactions contributed to the disease response phenotypes observed in the two mapping populations. For each population, five pairwise interactions exceeded the 5% false discovery rate threshold. Two candidate genes were involved in significant pairwise interactions. Markers in three genomic regions were involved in two or more epistatic interactions. Therefore, this study has identified pea defence-related sequences that are candidates for resistance determination, and that may be useful for marker-assisted selection. The demonstration of epistasis informs breeders that the architecture of this complex quantitative resistance includes epistatic interactions with non-additive effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26801334     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-016-2669-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  62 in total

1.  OneMap: software for genetic mapping in outcrossing species.

Authors:  G R A Margarido; A P Souza; A A F Garcia
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Beyond the single gene: How epistasis and gene-by-environment effects influence crop domestication.

Authors:  Andrew N Doust; Lewis Lukens; Kenneth M Olsen; Margarita Mauro-Herrera; Ann Meyer; Kimberly Rogers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diversity in receptor-like kinase genes is a major determinant of quantitative resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. matthioli.

Authors:  Stephanie J Cole; Andrew C Diener
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  High-density genome-wide association mapping implicates an F-box encoding gene in Medicago truncatula resistance to Aphanomyces euteiches.

Authors:  Maxime Bonhomme; Olivier André; Yacine Badis; Joëlle Ronfort; Concetta Burgarella; Nathalie Chantret; Jean-Marie Prosperi; Roman Briskine; Joann Mudge; Frédéric Debéllé; Hélène Navier; Henri Miteul; Ahmed Hajri; Alain Baranger; Peter Tiffin; Bernard Dumas; Marie-Laure Pilet-Nayel; Nevin D Young; Christophe Jacquet
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Linkage mapping of sbm-1, a gene conferring resistance to pea seed-borne mosaic virus, using molecular markers in Pisum sativum.

Authors:  G M Timmerman; T J Frew; A L Miller; N F Weeden; W A Jermyn
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement.

Authors:  Rajeev K Varshney; Chi Song; Rachit K Saxena; Sarwar Azam; Sheng Yu; Andrew G Sharpe; Steven Cannon; Jongmin Baek; Benjamin D Rosen; Bunyamin Tar'an; Teresa Millan; Xudong Zhang; Larissa D Ramsay; Aiko Iwata; Ying Wang; William Nelson; Andrew D Farmer; Pooran M Gaur; Carol Soderlund; R Varma Penmetsa; Chunyan Xu; Arvind K Bharti; Weiming He; Peter Winter; Shancen Zhao; James K Hane; Noelia Carrasquilla-Garcia; Janet A Condie; Hari D Upadhyaya; Ming-Cheng Luo; Mahendar Thudi; C L L Gowda; Narendra P Singh; Judith Lichtenzveig; Krishna K Gali; Josefa Rubio; N Nadarajan; Jaroslav Dolezel; Kailash C Bansal; Xun Xu; David Edwards; Gengyun Zhang; Guenter Kahl; Juan Gil; Karam B Singh; Swapan K Datta; Scott A Jackson; Jun Wang; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 7.  Salicylic Acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease.

Authors:  A Corina Vlot; D'Maris Amick Dempsey; Daniel F Klessig
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.078

8.  MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes.

Authors:  Oliver Thimm; Oliver Bläsing; Yves Gibon; Axel Nagel; Svenja Meyer; Peter Krüger; Joachim Selbig; Lukas A Müller; Seung Y Rhee; Mark Stitt
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.417

9.  Epistatic interaction maps relative to multiple metabolic phenotypes.

Authors:  Evan S Snitkin; Daniel Segrè
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  An improved genome release (version Mt4.0) for the model legume Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Haibao Tang; Vivek Krishnakumar; Shelby Bidwell; Benjamin Rosen; Agnes Chan; Shiguo Zhou; Laurent Gentzbittel; Kevin L Childs; Mark Yandell; Heidrun Gundlach; Klaus F X Mayer; David C Schwartz; Christopher D Town
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Omics resources and omics-enabled approaches for achieving high productivity and improved quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.).

Authors:  Arun K Pandey; Diego Rubiales; Yonggang Wang; Pingping Fang; Ting Sun; Na Liu; Pei Xu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  Genomics Enabled Breeding Strategies for Major Biotic Stresses in Pea (Pisum sativum L.).

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Parihar; Jitendra Kumar; Debjyoti Sen Gupta; Amrit Lamichaney; Satheesh Naik Sj; Anil K Singh; Girish P Dixit; Sanjeev Gupta; Faruk Toklu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Fine Mapping of QTLs for Ascochyta Blight Resistance in Pea Using Heterogeneous Inbred Families.

Authors:  Ambuj B Jha; Krishna K Gali; Bunyamin Tar'an; Thomas D Warkentin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 4.  Genomics of Plant Disease Resistance in Legumes.

Authors:  Prasanna Kankanala; Raja Sekhar Nandety; Kirankumar S Mysore
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Plant Height in Soybean Using Two RIL Populations Sharing a Common M8206 Parent.

Authors:  Yongce Cao; Shuguang Li; Guoliang Chen; Yanfeng Wang; Javaid Akhter Bhat; Benjamin Karikari; Jiejie Kong; Junyi Gai; Tuanjie Zhao
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26

6.  QTL dissection and mining of candidate genes for Ascochyta fabae and Orobanche crenata resistance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.).

Authors:  Natalia Gutierrez; Ana M Torres
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 7.  Breeding and Genomics Interventions for Developing Ascochyta Blight Resistant Grain Legumes.

Authors:  Uday C Jha; Kamal Dev Sharma; Harsh Nayyar; Swarup K Parida; Kadambot H M Siddique
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.