PURPOSE: We compare the performance of eight parallel transmit (pTx) body arrays with up to 32 channels and a standard birdcage design. Excitation uniformity, local specific absorption rate (SAR), global SAR, and power metrics are analyzed in the torso at 3 T for radiofrequency (RF)-shimming and 2-spoke excitations. METHODS: We used a fast cosimulation strategy for field calculation in the presence of coupling between transmit channels. We designed spoke pulses using magnitude least squares optimization with explicit constraint of SAR and power and compared the performance of the different pTx coils using the L-curve method. RESULTS: PTx arrays outperformed the conventional birdcage coil in all metrics except peak and average power efficiency. The presence of coupling exacerbated this power efficiency problem. At constant excitation fidelity, the pTx array with 24 channels arranged in three z-rows could decrease local SAR more than 4-fold (2-fold) for RF-shimming (2-spoke) compared to the birdcage coil for pulses of equal duration. Multi-row pTx coils had a marked performance advantage compared to single row designs, especially for coronal imaging. CONCLUSION: PTx coils can simultaneously improve the excitation uniformity and reduce SAR compared to a birdcage coil when SAR metrics are explicitly constrained in the pulse design.
PURPOSE: We compare the performance of eight parallel transmit (pTx) body arrays with up to 32 channels and a standard birdcage design. Excitation uniformity, local specific absorption rate (SAR), global SAR, and power metrics are analyzed in the torso at 3 T for radiofrequency (RF)-shimming and 2-spoke excitations. METHODS: We used a fast cosimulation strategy for field calculation in the presence of coupling between transmit channels. We designed spoke pulses using magnitude least squares optimization with explicit constraint of SAR and power and compared the performance of the different pTx coils using the L-curve method. RESULTS:PTx arrays outperformed the conventional birdcage coil in all metrics except peak and average power efficiency. The presence of coupling exacerbated this power efficiency problem. At constant excitation fidelity, the pTx array with 24 channels arranged in three z-rows could decrease local SAR more than 4-fold (2-fold) for RF-shimming (2-spoke) compared to the birdcage coil for pulses of equal duration. Multi-row pTx coils had a marked performance advantage compared to single row designs, especially for coronal imaging. CONCLUSION:PTx coils can simultaneously improve the excitation uniformity and reduce SAR compared to a birdcage coil when SAR metrics are explicitly constrained in the pulse design.
Authors: William Grissom; Chun-yu Yip; Zhenghui Zhang; V Andrew Stenger; Jeffrey A Fessler; Douglas C Noll Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Adam C Zelinski; Leonardo M Angelone; Vivek K Goyal; Giorgio Bonmassar; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Lawrence L Wald Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kamil Uğurbil; Edward Auerbach; Steen Moeller; Andrea Grant; Xiaoping Wu; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Cheryl Olman; Lance DelaBarre; Scott Schillak; Jerahmie Radder; Russell Lagore; Gregor Adriany Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bastien Guerin; Maria Ida Iacono; Mathias Davids; Darin Dougherty; Leonardo M Angelone; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Edward J Auerbach; An T Vu; Steen Moeller; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gerd Weidemann; Frank Seifert; Werner Hoffmann; Harald Pfeiffer; Reiner Seemann; Bernd Ittermann Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Zohaib Mahmood; Patrick McDaniel; Bastien Guérin; Boris Keil; Markus Vester; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Lawrence L Wald; Luca Daniel Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Xiaotong Zhang; Jinfeng Tian; Sebastian Schmitter; Brian Hanna; John Strupp; Josef Pfeuffer; Michael Hamm; Dingxin Wang; Juergen Nistler; Bin He; Thomas J Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 4.044