Literature DB >> 30625451

The 'virtual DBS population': five realistic computational models of deep brain stimulation patients for electromagnetic MR safety studies.

Bastien Guerin1, Maria Ida Iacono, Mathias Davids, Darin Dougherty, Leonardo M Angelone, Lawrence L Wald.   

Abstract

We design, develop, and disseminate a 'virtual population' of five realistic computational models of deep brain stimulation (DBS) patients for electromagnetic (EM) analysis. We found five DBS patients in our institution' research patient database who received high quality post-DBS surgery computer tomography (CT) examinations of the head and neck. Three patients have a single implanted pulse generator (IPG) and the two others have two IPGs (one for each lead). Moreover, one patient has two abandoned leads on each side of the head. For each patient, we combined the head and neck volumes into a 'virtual CT', from which we extracted the full-length DBS path including the IPG, extension cables, and leads. We corrected topology errors in this path, such as self-intersections, using a previously published optimization procedure. We segmented the virtual CT volume into bones, internal air, and soft tissue classes and created two-manifold, watertight surface meshes of these distributions. In addition, we added a segmented model of the brain (grey matter, white matter, eyes and cerebrospinal fluid) to one of the model (nickname Freddie) that was derived from a T1-weighted MR image obtained prior to the DBS implantation. We simulated the EM fields and specific absorption rate (SAR) induced at 3 Tesla by a quadrature birdcage body coil in each of the five patient models using a co-simulation strategy. We found that inter-subject peak SAR variability across models was independent of the target averaging mass and equal to ~45%. In our simulations of the full brain segmentation and six simplified versions of the Freddie model, the error associated with incorrect dielectric property assignment around the DBS electrodes was greater than the error associated with modeling the whole model as a single tissue class. Our DBS patient models are freely available on our lab website (Webpage of the Martinos Center Phantom Resource 2018 https://phantoms.martinos.org/Main_Page).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30625451      PMCID: PMC6530797          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aafce8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  38 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Todd M Herrington; Jennifer J Cheng; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Analysis of the role of lead resistivity in specific absorption rate for deep brain stimulator leads at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Leonardo M Angelone; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Calculation of MRI-induced heating of an implanted medical lead wire with an electric field transfer function.

Authors:  Sung-Min Park; Rungkiet Kamondetdacha; John A Nyenhuis
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Reduction of the radiofrequency heating of metallic devices using a dual-drive birdcage coil.

Authors:  Yigitcan Eryaman; Esra Abaci Turk; Cagdas Oto; Oktay Algin; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Fast MRI coil analysis based on 3-D electromagnetic and RF circuit co-simulation.

Authors:  Mikhail Kozlov; Robert Turner
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz.

Authors:  S Gabriel; R W Lau; C Gabriel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Feasibility of using linearly polarized rotating birdcage transmitters and close-fitting receive arrays in MRI to reduce SAR in the vicinity of deep brain simulation implants.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Boris Keil; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar; Azma Mareyam; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Bilateral deep-brain stimulation of the globus pallidus in primary generalized dystonia.

Authors:  Marie Vidailhet; Laurent Vercueil; Jean-Luc Houeto; Pierre Krystkowiak; Alim-Louis Benabid; Philippe Cornu; Christelle Lagrange; Sophie Tézenas du Montcel; Didier Dormont; Sylvie Grand; Serge Blond; Olivier Detante; Bernard Pillon; Claire Ardouin; Yves Agid; Alain Destée; Pierre Pollak
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Bettina H Bewernick; René Hurlemann; Andreas Matusch; Sarah Kayser; Christiane Grubert; Barbara Hadrysiewicz; Nikolai Axmacher; Matthias Lemke; Deirdre Cooper-Mahkorn; Michael X Cohen; Holger Brockmann; Doris Lenartz; Volker Sturm; Thomas E Schlaepfer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Realistic modeling of deep brain stimulation implants for electromagnetic MRI safety studies.

Authors:  Bastien Guerin; Peter Serano; Maria Ida Iacono; Todd M Herrington; Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Giorgio Bonmassar; Leonardo M Angelone; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Parallel transmission to reduce absorbed power around deep brain stimulation devices in MRI: Impact of number and arrangement of transmit channels.

Authors:  Bastien Guerin; Leonardo M Angelone; Darin Dougherty; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A workflow for predicting temperature increase at the electrical contacts of deep brain stimulation electrodes undergoing MRI.

Authors:  Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh; Nur Izzati Huda Zulkarnain; Xiaoxuan He; Ergin Atalar; Noam Harel; Yigitcan Eryaman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Modeling radiofrequency responses of realistic multi-electrode leads containing helical and straight wires.

Authors:  Mikhail Kozlov; Marc Horner; Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.310

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.