Literature DB >> 11184118

The relationship between modifiable health risks and group-level health care expenditures. Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO) Research Committee.

D R Anderson1, R W Whitmer, R Z Goetzel, R J Ozminkowski, R L Dunn, J Wasserman, S Serxner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between modifiable health risks and total health care expenditures for a large employee group.
DESIGN: Risk data were collected through voluntary participation in health risk assessment (HRA) and worksite biometric screenings and were linked at the individual level to health care plan enrollment and expenditure data from employers' fee-for-service plans over the 6-year study period.
SETTING: The setting was worksite health promotion programs sponsored by six large private-sector and public-sector employers.
SUBJECTS: Of the 50% of employees who completed the HRA, 46,026 (74.7%) met all inclusion criteria for the analysis. MEASURES: Eleven risk factors (exercise, alcohol use, eating, current and former tobacco use, depression, stress, blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, and blood glucose) were dichotomized into high-risk and lower-risk levels. The association between risks and expenditures was estimated using a two-part regression model, controlling for demographics and other confounders. Risk prevalence data were used to estimate group-level impact of risks on expenditures.
RESULTS: Risk factors were associated with 25% of total expenditures. Stress was the most costly factor, with tobacco use, overweight, and lack of exercise also being linked to substantial expenditures.
CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable risk factors contribute substantially to overall health care expenditures. Health promotion programs that reduce these risks may be beneficial for employers in controlling health care costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11184118     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  13 in total

Review 1.  Promoting health and wellness in the workplace: a unique opportunity to establish primary and extended secondary cardiovascular risk reduction programs.

Authors:  Ross Arena; Marco Guazzi; Paige D Briggs; Lawrence P Cahalin; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky; Daniel E Forman; Gerson Cipriano; Audrey Borghi-Silva; Abraham Samuel Babu; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  The role of the work context in multiple wellness outcomes for hospital patient care workers.

Authors:  Glorian Sorensen; Anne M Stoddard; Sonja Stoffel; Orfeu Buxton; Grace Sembajwe; Dean Hashimoto; Jack T Dennerlein; Karen Hopcia
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Madhav R Patel; Kevin C Jacob; Frank A Chavez; Justin T DesLaurier; Hanna Pawlowski; Michael C Prabhu; Nisheka N Vanjani; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 4.  Direct medical cost of overweight and obesity in the USA: a quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  A G Tsai; D F Williamson; H A Glick
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Multinational survey of chiropractic patients: reasons for seeking care.

Authors:  Charles Blum; Gary Globe; Lisa Terre; Timothy A Mirtz; Leon Greene; Denise Globe
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2008-08

6.  Earbud-based sensor for the assessment of energy expenditure, HR, and VO2max.

Authors:  Steven Francis Leboeuf; Michael E Aumer; William E Kraus; Johanna L Johnson; Brian Duscha
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  The Effects of Two Workplace Weight Management Programs and Weight Loss on Health Care Utilization and Costs.

Authors:  Truls Østbye; Marissa Stroo; Eric L Eisenstein; John M Dement
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  The societal benefits of reducing six behavioural risk factors: an economic modelling study from Australia.

Authors:  Dominique A Cadilhac; Anne Magnus; Lauren Sheppard; Toby B Cumming; Dora C Pearce; Rob Carter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Design, development and validation of the RedBrick Health Assessment: a questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Peter R Mills; Wendy S Masloski; Carole M Bashaw; Jolene Rw Butler; Molly E Hillstrom; Eric M Zimmerman
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-09-01

10.  The development of a new corporate specific health risk measurement instrument, and its use in investigating the relationship between health and well-being and employee productivity.

Authors:  Peter R Mills
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.