Literature DB >> 24738774

Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays.

David E Anderson1, Edward F Ester, Daniel Klee, Edward K Vogel, Edward Awh.   

Abstract

Visual perception is strongly impaired when peripheral targets are surrounded by nearby distractors, a phenomenon known as visual crowding. One common behavioral signature of visual crowding is an increased tendency for observers to mistakenly report the features of nearby distractors instead of the target item. Here, our goal was to distinguish between two possible explanations of such substitution errors. On the one hand, crowding may have its effects after the deployment of attention toward-and individuation of-targets and flankers, such that multiple individuated perceptual representations compete to guide the behavioral response. On the other hand, crowding may prevent the individuation of closely spaced stimuli, thereby reducing the number of apprehended items. We attempted to distinguish these alternatives using the N2pc, an ERP that has been shown to track the deployment of spatial attention and index the number of individuated items within a hemifield. N2pc amplitude increased monotonically with set size in uncrowded displays, but this set size effect was abolished in crowded visual displays. Moreover, these crowding-induced declines in N2pc amplitude predicted individual differences in the rate of substitution errors. Thus, crowding-induced confusions between targets and distractors may be a consequence of failures to individuate target and distractor stimuli during early stages of visual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24738774      PMCID: PMC4461358          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  53 in total

1.  Configuration influence on crowding.

Authors:  Tomer Livne; Dov Sagi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Crowding with conjunctions of simple features.

Authors:  Endel Põder; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Andrew Kohnen; Brian Barton; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Michael H Herzog; Gerald Westheimer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Non-linear integration of crowded orientation signals.

Authors:  Carolina Gheri; Stefano Baldassi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Global stimulus configuration modulates crowding.

Authors:  Toni P Saarela; Bilge Sayim; Gerald Westheimer; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Contrast polarity, chromaticity, and stereoscopic depth modulate contextual interactions in vernier acuity.

Authors:  Bilge Sayim; Gerald Westheimer; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The uncrowded window of object recognition.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Katharine A Tillman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  4 in total

1.  How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Emma Zilber; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Shape facilitates number: brain potentials and microstates reveal the interplay between shape and numerosity in human vision.

Authors:  Elena Gheorghiu; Benjamin R Dering
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The whole is faster than its parts: evidence for temporally independent attention to distinct spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew Clement; Nestor Matthews
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.