Literature DB >> 18217816

Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds.

Maka Malania1, Michael H Herzog, Gerald Westheimer.   

Abstract

To reveal the mechanisms of spatial interference in the fovea, we examined the capacity of a variety of lateral flanking configurations to interfere with alignment thresholds of a vertical vernier. A single line on each side of the vernier, at the optimal separation of 2-3 arcmin, raises thresholds threefold or more and masks most effectively when its length equals that of the vernier. For an array of equal lines whose length differs from that of the vernier, masking is reduced but not when vernier and flanks have the same length. The reduction for shorter and longer flanks can be reversed by inserting a gap in the row of flanks. By comparing the masking effect of arrays of mixed line lengths, we show that when a pair of flanks, which by itself masks strongly, becomes a component of a coherent contextual configuration, it loses much of its effectiveness to interact. Observers' ranking of the conspicuity of the vernier test pattern among the flanking elements is negatively correlated with the threshold elevation. We conclude that clustering of contextual patterns influences their capacity to mask. Discrimination of a target deteriorates when the target is grouped within an array of surrounding elements.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217816     DOI: 10.1167/7.2.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Crowding by a repeating pattern.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-04

4.  Feature integration across space, time, and orientation.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Ogmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Spatial processing and visual backward masking.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

6.  Perceptual comparison of features within and between objects: a new look.

Authors:  S J Harrison; J Feldman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Crowding in peripheral vision: why bigger is better.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Thom Carney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.