Literature DB >> 19263165

Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths.

Watjana Lilaonitkul1, John J Guinan.   

Abstract

Animal studies have led to the view that the acoustic medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent reflex provides sharply tuned frequency-specific feedback that inhibits cochlear amplification. To determine if MOC activation is indeed narrow band, we measured the MOC effects in humans elicited by 60-dB sound pressure level (SPL) contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral noise bands as a function of noise bandwidth from 1/2 to 6.7 octaves. MOC effects were quantified by the change in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions from 40 dB SPL probe tones near 0.5, 1, and 4 kHz. In a second experiment, the noise bands were centered 2 octaves below probe frequencies near 1 and 4 kHz. In all cases, the MOC effects increased as elicitor bandwidth increased, with the effect saturating at about 4 octaves. Generally, the MOC effects increased as the probe frequency decreased, opposite expectations based on MOC innervation density in the cochlea. Bilateral-elicitor effects were always the largest. The ratio of ipsilateral/contralateral effects depended on elicitor bandwidth; the ratio was large for narrow-band probe-centered elicitors and approximately unity for wide-band elicitors. In another experiment, the MOC effects from increasing elicitor bandwidths were calculated from measurements of the MOC effects from adjacent half-octave noise bands. The predicted bandwidth function agreed well with the measured bandwidth function for contralateral elicitors, but overestimated it for ipsilateral and bilateral elicitors. Overall, the results indicate that (1) the MOC reflexes integrate excitation from almost the entire cochlear length, (2) as elicitor bandwidth is increased, the excitation from newly stimulated cochlear regions more than overcomes the reduced excitation at frequencies in the center of the elicitor band, and (3) contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitors show MOC reflex spatial summation over most of the cochlea, but ipsilateral spatial summation is less additive than contralateral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263165      PMCID: PMC3084380          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0163-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  46 in total

1.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Bradford C Backus; Watjana Lilaonitkul; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-13

2.  Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  J J Guinan
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1986

3.  Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat.

Authors:  M C Liberman; M C Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear responses.

Authors:  M L Gifford; J J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise.

Authors:  R L Winslow; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A new rapid component in the cochlear response to brief electrical efferent stimulation: CM and otoacoustic observations.

Authors:  D T Kemp; M Souter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Olivocochlear neurons in the squirrel monkey brainstem.

Authors:  G C Thompson; A M Thompson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1986-12-08       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.

Authors:  R L Winslow; M B Sachs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral versus medial zones of the superior olivary complex.

Authors:  J J Guinan; W B Warr; B E Norris
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-12-10       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Horseradish peroxidase injection of physiologically characterized afferent and efferent neurones in the guinea pig spiral ganglion.

Authors:  D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  59 in total

1.  Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

3.  The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling the anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses to tones in sustained noise.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04

6.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

7.  Modeling the time-varying and level-dependent effects of the medial olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-05

8.  Properties of a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.

Authors:  Lynne Marshall; Judi A Lapsley Miller; John J Guinan; Christopher A Shera; Charlotte M Reed; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Paul Boege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.