Literature DB >> 24726160

Changes in custom biomechanical variables after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

Marcony R Santhiago1, Steven E Wilson2, Katie M Hallahan2, David Smadja2, Michelle Lin2, Renato Ambrosio2, Vivek Singh2, Abhjit Sinha Roy2, William J Dupps2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze changes in new biomechanical descriptors with myopic femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), compare them with the biomechanical response after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with similar levels of myopic ablation, and evaluate correlations between changes in custom variables and biomechanically relevant variables.
SETTING: Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
METHODS: Custom biomechanical variables from the Optical Response Analyzer were assessed preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Differences between preoperative values and postoperative values were determined. Intraindividual change (preoperative value minus postoperative value) was calculated and compared with changes after PRK. The correlation of the change in each custom biomechanical variable with the preoperative central corneal thickness, residual stromal bed tissue ablated, and percentage of tissue depth altered was also studied.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 156 eyes of 156 consecutive patients. Fifteen variables changed significantly after femtosecond myopic LASIK and were stable postoperatively because no significant difference was shown between 1-month values and 3-month values. Comparison of the changes in biomechanical variables between LASIK and PRK eyes showed no significant differences. Surgical changes in several custom biomechanical variables correlated with the percentage of tissue depth altered.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide the first reference values for a more comprehensive panel of indicators of the biomechanical response to myopic LASIK and PRK. Changes in custom variables reflected a consistent decrease in corneal biomechanical resistance to deformation after myopic femtosecond LASIK and PRK. For comparable attempted corrections, biomechanical changes were comparable between femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and PRK. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosures are listed after the references.
Copyright © 2014 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726160      PMCID: PMC6041120          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  22 in total

1.  The three-dimensional organization of collagen fibrils in the human cornea and sclera.

Authors:  Y Komai; T Ushiki
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Patient-specific modeling of corneal refractive surgery outcomes and inverse estimation of elastic property changes.

Authors:  Abhijit Sinha Roy; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

Authors:  Mujtaba A Qazi; Jeff P Sanderson; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Eric Y Yoon; Cynthia J Roberts; Jay S Pepose
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 5.  Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.

Authors:  Bruno M Fontes; Renato Ambrósio; Daniela Jardim; Guillermo C Velarde; Walton Nosé
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in keratoconus.

Authors:  Katie M Hallahan; Abhijit Sinha Roy; Renato Ambrosio; Marcella Salomao; William J Dupps
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Sunil Shah; Mohammed Laiquzzaman; Rajan Bhojwani; Sanjay Mantry; Ian Cunliffe
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Thresholds for interface haze formation after thin-flap femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; Roman Kagan; Scott D Smith; Ronald R Krueger
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Probability model of the inaccuracy of residual stromal thickness prediction to reduce the risk of ectasia after LASIK part II: quantifying population risk.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Sabong Srivannaboon; Timothy J Archer; Ronald H Silverman; Hugo Sutton; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  10 in total

1.  Factors associated with changes in posterior corneal surface following photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Achia Nemet; Michael Mimouni; Igor Vainer; Tzahi Sela; Igor Kaiserman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Corneal Deformation Response and Ocular Geometry: A Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy in Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Lauren C Beene; Elias I Traboulsi; Ibrahim Seven; Matthew R Ford; Abhijit Sinha Roy; Robert S Butler; William J Dupps
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Could the percent tissue altered (PTA) index be considered as a unique factor in ectasia risk assessment?

Authors:  Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada; José-María Sánchez-González; Rahul Rachwani-Anil; Juan-Luis García-Madrona; Federico Alonso-Aliste; Sandra Figueroa-Ardila; Elvira Colmenero-Reina
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Effect of femtosecond and microkeratome flaps creation on the cornea biomechanics during laser in situ keratomileusis: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Zheng-Zheng Deng; Yue-Hua Zhou; Jing Zhang; Xiao-Yan Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Custom air puff-derived biomechanical variables in a refractive surgery screening setting: Study from 2 centers.

Authors:  Vinicius S De Stefano; Ibrahim Seven; J Bradley Randleman; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Computational Biomechanical Analysis of Asymmetric Ectasia Risk in Unilateral Post-LASIK Ectasia.

Authors:  Ali Vahdati; Ibrahim Seven; Naveen Mysore; J Bradley Randleman; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of bandage contact lens removal on the fourth versus seventh postoperative day after photorefractive keratectomy: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Delaram Shakoor; Hassan Hashemi; Mohamad Aghaie Meybodi; Fateme Rajabi; Pegah Hosseini
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-23

8.  Study on change in corneal biomechanics and effect of percent tissue altered in myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Murugesan Vanathi; Suresh Azimeera; Noopur Gupta; Radhika Tandon
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Intraocular pressure after myopic laser refractive surgery measured with a new Goldmann convex prism: correlations with GAT and ORA.

Authors:  María Iglesias; Bachar Kudsieh; Andrea Laiseca; Cristina Santos; Jeroni Nadal; Rafael Barraquer; Ricardo P Casaroli-Marano
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 10.  Ectasia risk factors in refractive surgery.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Natalia T Giacomin; David Smadja; Samir J Bechara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.