Literature DB >> 24719657

Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach for the abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-an evaluation of abdominal bulge formation-.

Naoki Hayashida1, Masahisa Masuda2, Yoko Pearce3, Satoshi Kuwabara4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of wound complications after the retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, and to ascertain the cause of abdominal bulge (AB). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with AAA repair via the retroperitoneal space were retrospectively investigated. Wound complications and their incidence were studied by chart review. The thickness of the abdominal wall muscle was measured by follow-up computed tomography films. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) of the abdominal rectus muscle were examined for three bulge patients and three non-bulge patients.
RESULTS: Wound hypoesthesia (30%), wound numbness (21%), AB (7%), and wound pain (2%) were found in these patients. The thickness of the abdominal wall muscle was reduced in the incision side. CMAP of abdominal rectus muscle in the incision side disappeared only in AB patients.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) Wound hypoesthesia and numbness displayed a high incidence. (2) Atrophy of the abdominal wall muscle in the incision side was found in these patients. (3) The cause of AB is considered to be muscle atrophy induced by denervation injury of an 11th intercostal nerve. (4) To avoid an eleventh intercostal nerve injury must be deemed the most effective method for preventing AB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal aortic aneurysm; abdominal bulge; retroperitoneal approach; wound complications

Year:  2014        PMID: 24719657      PMCID: PMC3968410          DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.13-00088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis        ISSN: 1881-641X


  12 in total

1.  Midline retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  T Nakajima; K Kawazoe; K Komoda; T Sasaki; S Ohsawa; T Kamada
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  The retroperitoneal approach to abdominal aneurysms.

Authors:  C B Anderson; B T Allen; G A Sicard
Journal:  Surg Annu       Date:  1990

3.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  R P Cambria; D C Brewster; W M Abbott; M Freehan; J Megerman; G LaMuraglia; R Wilson; D Wilson; R Teplick; J K Davison
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: current status of the controversy.

Authors:  D C Brewster
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta and iliac vessels.

Authors:  M P Honig; R A Mason; F Giron
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Avoiding abdominal flank bulge after anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine: cadaveric study and electrophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Daniel K Fahim; Sang Don Kim; Dosang Cho; Sangkook Lee; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-08-05

Review 7.  The retroperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta in the endovascular era.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Ian F Lane; Ian M Williams
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  The retroperitoneal incision. An evaluation of postoperative flank 'bulge'.

Authors:  G P Gardner; L G Josephs; M Rosca; J Rich; J Woodson; J O Menzoian
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-07

9.  Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  G A Sicard; J M Reilly; B G Rubin; R W Thompson; B T Allen; M W Flye; K B Schechtman; P Young-Beyer; C Weiss; C B Anderson
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Advantages of using the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  M Endo; K Kobayashi; M Tsubota; M Seki; H Sato; T Noto; T Iwa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.