Literature DB >> 7853592

Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trial.

G A Sicard1, J M Reilly, B G Rubin, R W Thompson, B T Allen, M W Flye, K B Schechtman, P Young-Beyer, C Weiss, C B Anderson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized, prospective trial that compares the transabdominal with the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta for routine infrarenal aortic reconstruction.
METHODS: From August 1990 through November 1993, patients undergoing surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) were asked to participate in a randomized trial comparing the transabdominal incision (TAI) to the retroperitoneal incision (RPI) for aortic surgery. One hundred forty-five patients were randomized, with 75 (41 with AAA and 34 with AIOD) in the TAI group and 70 (40 with AAA and 30 with AIOD) in the RPI group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, postoperative pain control (epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia), or comorbid conditions, except for a higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the TAI group (21 vs 8 patients).
RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative complications was similar for both groups. After surgery, the incidence of prolonged ileus (p = 0.013) and small bowel obstruction (p = 0.05) was higher in the TAI group. Overall, the RPI group had significantly fewer complications (p < 0.0001). The overall postoperative mortality rate (two deaths) was 1.4%, with both occurring in the TAI group (p = 0.507). The RPI group also had significantly shorter stays in the intensive care unit (p = 0.006), a trend toward shorter hospitalization (p = 0.10), lower total hospital charges (p = 0.019), and lower total hospital costs (p = 0.017). There was no difference in pulmonary complications (p = 0.71). In long-term follow-up (mean 23 months), the RPI group reported more incisional pain (p = 0.056), but no difference was found in incisional hernias or bulges (p = 0.297).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the RPI approach for abdominal aortic surgery is associated with fewer postoperative complications, shorter stays in the hospital and intensive care unit, and lower cost. There is, however, an increase in long-term incisional pain. Current methods of postoperative pain control seem to decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7853592     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70260-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  17 in total

1.  The retroperitoneal approach to unusual abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  A Lyons; P Lewis; A Shandall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Current status of the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Linda J Wang; Anand M Prabhakar; Christopher J Kwolek
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

3.  Videoendoscopically assisted combined retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal approach for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Authors:  P K Chowbey; R Panse; A Sharma; R Khullar; V Soni; M Baijal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Retroperitoneal approach via paramedian incision for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Authors:  Bilgin Emrecan; Gokhan Onem; Erkin Ocak; Murat Arslan; Baki Yagci; Ahmet Baltalarli; Beyza Akdag
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

5.  Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach for the abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-an evaluation of abdominal bulge formation-.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashida; Masahisa Masuda; Yoko Pearce; Satoshi Kuwabara
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04

6.  Endoluminal graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients and octogenarians: is it better than open repair?

Authors:  G A Sicard; B G Rubin; L A Sanchez; C A Keller; M W Flye; D Picus; D Hovsepian; E T Choi; P J Geraghty; R W Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Elective surgery for aortic abdominal aneurysm: comparison of English outcomes with those elsewhere.

Authors:  Miodrag Filipovic; Michael J Goldacre; Leicester Gill
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Transabdominal open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with higher rates of late reintervention and readmission compared with the retroperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Sara L Zettervall; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Philip P Goodney; Fred A Weaver; Pedro G Teixeira; Virendra I Patel; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Current status of the use of retroperitoneal approach for reconstructions of the aorta and its branches.

Authors:  C Darling; D M Shah; B B Chang; P S Paty; R P Leather
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Klaas H J Ultee; Sara L Zettervall; Pete A Soden; Jeremy Darling; Mark Wyers; Joost A van Herwaarden; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.