Literature DB >> 2405200

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study.

R P Cambria1, D C Brewster, W M Abbott, M Freehan, J Megerman, G LaMuraglia, R Wilson, D Wilson, R Teplick, J K Davison.   

Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was conducted to compare the retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective aortic reconstruction. One hundred thirteen patients (transperitoneal = 59, retroperitoneal = 54) were randomized between March 1987 and October 1988. In addition, to assess the changing course of patients undergoing aortic reconstruction similar data were gathered retrospectively on a group of 56 patients undergoing aortic reconstruction by the same surgeons performed via a transperitoneal approach in 1984 to 1985. Randomized patients were identical in age, male to female ratio, smoking history, incidence and severity of cardiopulmonary disease, indication for operation, and use of epidural anesthetics. Details of operation including operative and aortic cross-clamp times, crystalloid and transfusion requirements, degree of hypothermia on arrival at the intensive care unit, and perioperative fluid and blood requirements did not differ significantly for patients undergoing transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal reconstruction. Respiratory morbidity, as assessed by percent of patients requiring postoperative ventilation, deterioration in pulmonary function tests, and the incidence of respiratory complications, was identical in randomized patients. Other aspects of postoperative recovery including recovery of gastrointestinal function, the requirement for narcotics, metabolic parameters of operative stress, the incidence of major and minor complications, and the duration of hospital stay were similar for randomized patients undergoing transperitoneal and retroperitoneal reconstruction. When compared to retrospectively reviewed patients having aortic reconstruction, randomized patients undergoing transperitoneal and retroperitoneal operations had highly significant (p less than 0.001) reductions in postoperative ventilation, transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay. Such trends were all independent of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2405200     DOI: 10.1067/mva.1990.17353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  19 in total

Review 1.  Current status of the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Linda J Wang; Anand M Prabhakar; Christopher J Kwolek
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  Current treatment strategies for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Andreas S Peters; Maani Hakimi; Philipp Erhart; Michael Keese; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Markus Wortmann; Moritz S Bischoff; Dittmar Böckler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Retroperitoneal approach via paramedian incision for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Authors:  Bilgin Emrecan; Gokhan Onem; Erkin Ocak; Murat Arslan; Baki Yagci; Ahmet Baltalarli; Beyza Akdag
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

4.  Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach for the abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-an evaluation of abdominal bulge formation-.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashida; Masahisa Masuda; Yoko Pearce; Satoshi Kuwabara
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04

5.  Respiratory function after aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison between retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches.

Authors:  Carlo A Volta; Enrico Ferri; Elisabetta Marangoni; Riccardo Ragazzi; Marco Verri; Valentina Alvisi; Silvia Zardi; Sara Bertacchini; Gaetano Gritti; Raffaele Alvisi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Current status of the use of retroperitoneal approach for reconstructions of the aorta and its branches.

Authors:  C Darling; D M Shah; B B Chang; P S Paty; R P Leather
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms: the importance of elective repair.

Authors:  A F Horgan; D S O'Riordain; M P Brady; J A O'Donnell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Regional variation exists in patient selection and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Sara L Zettervall; Dominique B Buck; Peter A Soden; Jack L Cronenwett; Phillip P Goodney; Mohammad H Eslami; Jason T Lee; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  M H Chen; E A Murphy; V Halpern; G R Faust; J M Cosgrove; J R Cohen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Klaas H J Ultee; Sara L Zettervall; Pete A Soden; Jeremy Darling; Mark Wyers; Joost A van Herwaarden; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.