Literature DB >> 8680113

Advantages of using the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

M Endo1, K Kobayashi, M Tsubota, M Seki, H Sato, T Noto, T Iwa.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for repairing abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with the transperitoneal approach. The intra- and postoperative course of 15 patients who underwent AAA repair using the transperitoneal approach between 1987 and 1991 and another 15 patients who underwent AAA repair using the retroperitoneal approach between 1991 and 1994 were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative wound complications was also assessed. There was no operative or hospital death in either group. Although a significantly longer interval was required from the incision to the aortic clamp using the extraperitoneal method, there were no statistical differences in the aortic clamping time, total operation time, or blood loss between the two groups. On the other hand, there was a statistically significant improvement in bowel function and a significant reduction in the length of postoperative hospitalization following the extraperitoneal procedure. Furthermore, no wound complications such as those associated with the left flank incision developed after the extraperitoneal procedure. Thus, we recommend the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for AAA as it does not involve muscle division and is associated with fewer complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8680113     DOI: 10.1007/bf00311983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  13 in total

1.  Extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  C ROB
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  G A Sicard; B T Allen; J S Munn; C B Anderson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  R P Cambria; D C Brewster; W M Abbott; M Freehan; J Megerman; G LaMuraglia; R Wilson; D Wilson; R Teplick; J K Davison
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta and iliac vessels.

Authors:  M P Honig; R A Mason; F Giron
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Ten-year review of non-ruptured aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  P Mutirangura; P A Stonebridge; A E Clason; J H McClure; J A Wildsmith; B Nolan; C V Ruckley; A M Jenkins
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery.

Authors:  R T Gregory; J R Wheeler; S O Snyder; R G Gayle; L P Love
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.888

7.  Comparative analysis of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal aortic replacement for aneurysm.

Authors:  R P Leather; D M Shah; J L Kaufman; K M Fitzgerald; B B Chang; P J Feustel
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989-05

8.  Midline extraperitoneal exposure of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries.

Authors:  H B Shumacker
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1972-11

9.  Elective resection of 332 abdominal aortic aneurysms in a southern West Virginia community during a recent five-year period.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; P A Robinson; J P Boland; F C Lucente; S P Stuart; S S Neuman; M D Hall; B A Hoak
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  The right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  B B Chang; P S Paty; D M Shah; R P Leather; J L Kaufman; W R McClellan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  1 in total

1.  Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach for the abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-an evaluation of abdominal bulge formation-.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashida; Masahisa Masuda; Yoko Pearce; Satoshi Kuwabara
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.