Literature DB >> 22796332

The retroperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta in the endovascular era.

Christopher P Twine1, Ian F Lane, Ian M Williams.   

Abstract

The aim of this review was to assess the place of retroperitoneal (RP) aortic surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in the endovascular era and evaluate the evidence supporting it in preference to the more traditional transperitoneal approach. As endovascular graft technology improves, open aortic surgery is declining. AAAs unsuitable for endovascular aneurysm repair are, by definition, anatomically challenging. The RP approach is especially suited to anatomic challenges such as those posed by contemporary open AAA because it facilitates access to the suprarenal aorta. There is evidence that the RP approach reduces postoperative morbidity and length of stay compared with transperitoneal approaches. The evidence available indicates that the RP approach should be the first considered for any AAA unsuitable for endovascular aneurysm repair; however, the technique is more difficult to learn and less commonly practiced than the transperitoneal approach. Combined with a decrease in training hours in the United Kingdom, there is a real threat that the RP technique will only be performed by an ever-decreasing number of enthusiasts.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22796332     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach for the abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-an evaluation of abdominal bulge formation-.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashida; Masahisa Masuda; Yoko Pearce; Satoshi Kuwabara
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04

2.  Benefit of minimally invasive treatment of concomitant multiple aortic aneurysms, atrial septal defect and colon cancer.

Authors:  Yu Inaba; Hideyuki Shimizu; Akihiro Yoshitake; Akio Kawamura; Keiichi Fukuda; Ryohei Yozu
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04

3.  Regional variation exists in patient selection and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Sara L Zettervall; Dominique B Buck; Peter A Soden; Jack L Cronenwett; Phillip P Goodney; Mohammad H Eslami; Jason T Lee; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Klaas H J Ultee; Sara L Zettervall; Pete A Soden; Jeremy Darling; Mark Wyers; Joost A van Herwaarden; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Combined Aorto-Iliac and Anterior Lumbar Spine Reconstruction: A Case Series.

Authors:  Matthew Scott-Young; Laurence McEntee; James Furness; Ben Schram; Wayne Hing; David Grosser; Mario Zotti
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

6.  Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Fan Mei; Kaiyan Hu; Bing Zhao; Qianqian Gao; Fei Chen; Li Zhao; Mei Wu; Liyuan Feng; Zhe Wang; Jinwei Yang; Weiyi Zhang; Bin Ma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.