| Literature DB >> 24716544 |
Tingting Wang1, Yuetong Ji1, Yun Wang1, Jing Jia1, Jing Li1, Shi Huang1, Danxiang Han2, Qiang Hu2, Wei E Huang3, Jian Xu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rapid, real-time and label-free measurement of the cellular contents of biofuel molecules such asEntities:
Keywords: Bioprocess dynamics; Microalgae; Population heterogeneity; Single-cell Raman spectra; Triacylglycerol
Year: 2014 PMID: 24716544 PMCID: PMC4022372 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-58
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Tracking the microalgal oil production via SCRS. (A) Averaged SCRS of the 60 cells of Group N- at each time point as well as the Raman spectrum of triolein, a typical TAG species. (B) Averaged SCRS of the 60 cells of Group N + at each time point. (C) PCA scores plot derived from the fingerprint region. (D) PCA scores plot derived from the hydrocarbon region. Each symbol represents the average of twenty cells of a triplicate; the error bars represents SD of the twenty cells. Green diamond: cells at 0 h. Red triangle: cells of Group N+. Blue square: cells of Group N-. h: hours; PCA: principal component analysis; PC: principal component; SCRS: single-cell Raman spectra; SD: standard derivation; TAG, triacylglycerol.
List of major Raman bands discriminating between different states of the cells
| ↑ | Lipid, Alkyl C—C gauche stretches | |
| ↑ | Carbohydrate, Carbohydrate C—O—H bending | |
| ↑ | Carbohydrate, C—O—H deformation, C—O and C—C stretches | |
| ↑ | Lipid, Alkyl =C—H cis stretches | |
| ↑ | Lipid, Alkyl C—H2 twist | |
| ↑ | Lipid, Alkyl C—H2 bend | |
| ↑ | Lipid, Alkyl C=C stretches | |
| ↑ | Lipid, Ester C=O stretches | |
| ↑ | Lipid, carbohydrate, C—H2, C—H3 asymmetric and symmetric stretches | |
| ↑ | ||
| ↓ | Protein, Phenylalanine ring breath | |
| ↓ | Protein Amide I |
Up and down arrows indicate the Raman bands which increased or decreased in intensity during the growth of Group N- cells respectively.
Figure 2Comparison of variation of SCRS. (A) Variation of Raman spectra of one Group N- cell at 48 hours for 20 continuous measurements. (B) Variation of Raman spectra of 20 Group N- cells at 48 hours as an example. SD is shown in gray. SCRS: single-cell Raman spectra; SD: standard derivation.
Predictive modeling of nutrition condition of single cells
| | 6 h | 12 h | 24 h | 36 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h* |
| 9 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 67.5 | 82.0 | 72.6 | 89.1 | 91.1 | 85.7 | 93.6 | |
| 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 | |
| 6.7 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | 6 h | 12 h | 24 h | 36 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h* |
| 10 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 89.1 | 95.8 | 94.9 | 96.3 | 94.7 | 97.9 | 97.2 | |
| 2.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 16.7 | 6.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
*For both calculations, one outlier was excluded from the training set at 96 h.
PC-LDA results were shown for discriminating cells between Groups N- and N + at each time point. h: hours; LDA: linear discriminant analysis; MCR: misclassification rate by leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV); PC: principal component.
Predictive modeling of growth stage of single cells
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (6.7%) | |
| 0 (0) | 1 (6.7%) | 4 (8.9%) | 2 (13.3%) | |
| 3 (6.7%) | 1 (6.7%) | 5 (11.1%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
| 4 (8.9%) | 1 (6.7%) | 6 (13.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
| 3 (6.7%) | 2 (13.3%) | 6 (13.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
| 6 (13.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0 (0) | |
| 1 (2.2%) | 2 (13.3%) | 6(13.3%) | 2 (13.3%) | |
| 5 (11.1%) | 1 (6.7%) | 4 (8.9%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
| 22 (6.1%) | 9 (7.5%) | 36 (10.0%) | 9 (7.5%) | |
PC-LDA results were shown for discriminating Group N- cells at different time points. h: hours; MCR: misclassification rate by leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV).
Figure 3Establishment and validation of the PLSR model for TAG content prediction. The predicted TAG content of each population by PLSR model was plotted versus the TAG content of the corresponding culture measured by LC-MS methods. LC-MS: liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; PLSR: partial least square regression; TAG: triacylglycerol.
Figure 4Quantitative analysis of TAG content and lipid unsaturation degree in single cells. (A) TAG content of individual cells as predicted by PLSR. Each square represents one Group N- cell. (B) Lipid unsaturation degree as determined by I1656/I1441. Each triangle represents one Group N + cell, and each square represents one Group N- cell. (C) Distribution of TAG content of Group N- cells at each time point. X axis is the predicted TAG content (mg g−1 dry weight), Y axis is the percentage of cells. Since TAG content is increasing sharply, the range of X axis is different between time points. (D) Distribution of lipid unsaturation degree of Group N- or Group N + cells at each time point. X axis is the lipid unsaturation degree, Y axis is the percentage of cells. h: hours; PLSR: partial least square regression; TAG: triacylglycerol.
Heterogeneity of TAG and lipid unsaturation degree as represented by RSD
| Predicted TAG content (Group N-) | 0.602 | 0.748 | 0.643 | 0.485 | 0.305 | 0.249 | 0.211 |
| Lipid unsaturation degree (Group N-) | 0.140 | 0.166 | 0.144 | 0.158 | 0.100 | 0.097 | 0.102 |
| Lipid unsaturation degree (Group N+) | 0.168 | 0.150 | 0.122 | 0.104 | 0.141 | 0.182 | 0.162 |
RSD: relative standard deviation; TAG: triacylglycerol; h: hours.
Figure 5Comparison of TAG content and lipid unsaturation among Group N- cells. Mean value and RSD value of predicted TAG content and lipid unsaturation degree of Group N- cells at each time point were compared to show temporal patterns of population heterogeneity. h: hours; RSD: relative standard deviation; TAG: triacylglycerol.