Literature DB >> 24715419

Demographic and experiential correlates of public attitudes towards cell-free fetal DNA screening.

Lauren C Sayres1, Megan Allyse, Taylor A Goodspeed, Mildred K Cho.   

Abstract

This study seeks to inform clinical application of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening as a novel method for prenatal trisomy detection by investigating public attitudes towards this technology and demographic and experiential characteristics related to these attitudes. Two versions of a 25-item survey assessing interest in cffDNA and existing first-trimester combined screening for either trisomy 13 and 18 or trisomy 21 were distributed among 3,164 members of the United States public. Logistic regression was performed to determine variables predictive of interest in screening options. Approximately 47% of respondents expressed an interest in cffDNA screening for trisomy 13, 18, and 21, with a majority interested in cffDNA screening as a stand-alone technique. A significantly greater percent would consider termination of pregnancy following a diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18 (52%) over one of trisomy 21 (44%). Willingness to consider abortion of an affected pregnancy was the strongest correlate to interest in both cffDNA and first-trimester combined screening, although markedly more respondents expressed an interest in some form of screening (69% and 71%, respectively) than would consider termination. Greater educational attainment, higher income, and insurance coverage predicted interest in cffDNA screening; stronger religious identification also corresponded to decreased interest. Prior experience with disability and genetic testing was associated with increased interest in cffDNA screening. Several of these factors, in addition to advanced age and Asian race, were, in turn, predictive of respondents' increased willingness to consider post-diagnosis termination of pregnancy. In conclusion, divergent attitudes towards cffDNA screening--and prenatal options more generally--appear correlated with individual socioeconomic and religious backgrounds and experiences with disability and genetic testing. Clinical implementation and counseling for novel prenatal technologies should take these diverse stakeholder values into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24715419      PMCID: PMC4192103          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9704-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  40 in total

1.  Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus.

Authors:  Jacob O Kitzman; Matthew W Snyder; Mario Ventura; Alexandra P Lewis; Ruolan Qiu; Lavone E Simmons; Hilary S Gammill; Craig E Rubens; Donna A Santillan; Jeffrey C Murray; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad; Evan E Eichler; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  Genomic analysis of fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood.

Authors:  Yuk Ming Dennis Lo; Rossa Wai Kwun Chiu
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Howard Cuckle; Eugene Pergament
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in Japan.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Keiko Koide; Yuditiya Purwosunu; Kiyotake Ichizuka; Ryu Matsuoka; Hiroshi Kawame; Takashi Okai
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Shilpa Chetty; Matthew J Garabedian; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Patricia L Devers; Amy Cronister; Kelly E Ormond; Flavia Facio; Campbell K Brasington; Pamela Flodman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Determinants of parental decisions after the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.

Authors:  R L Kramer; R K Jarve; Y Yaron; M P Johnson; J Lampinen; S B Kasperski; M I Evans
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1998-09-23

9.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: pregnant women's views and likely uptake.

Authors:  C Lewis; C Silcock; L S Chitty
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: service users' experiences of and preferences for service delivery.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Heather Skirton; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  9 in total

1.  "This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.

Authors:  Rosemary J Steinbach; Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie; Emily Y Liu; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren Carter Sayres; Taylor Goodspeed; Marsha Michie; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

3.  "The Top Priority Is a Healthy Baby": Narratives of Health, Disability, and Abortion in Online Pregnancy Forum Discussions in the US and China.

Authors:  Grace Li; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Megan Allyse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing?

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; Julie Mak; Talia Stanley; Michelle Bass; Mildred K Cho; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Mollie A Minear; Elisa Berson; Shilpa Sridhar; Margaret Rote; Anthony Hung; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-01-16

8.  Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; David Wright; Rebecca Daley; Celine Lewis; Fiona McKay; Sarah Mason; Nicholas Lench; Abigail Howarth; Christopher Boustred; Kitty Lo; Vincent Plagnol; Kevin Spencer; Jane Fisher; Mark Kroese; Stephen Morris; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Angela Barrett; Mahesh Choolani; Celine Lewis; Jane Fisher; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.050

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.