Literature DB >> 22573474

Fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: service users' experiences of and preferences for service delivery.

Celine Lewis1, Melissa Hill, Heather Skirton, Lyn S Chitty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine service users' experiences of and preferences for service delivery of fetal sex determination by noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) using cell-free fetal DNA.
METHODS: We used a qualitative approach using semistructured interviews. Thirty-eight women and six of their partners were recruited.
RESULTS: NIPD was viewed as a positive development, which facilitated reproductive autonomy as it expanded reproductive choice. The majority of women heard about NIPD during pregnancy and had received information about the test at a specialist centre. Features of NIPD women considered most important were that it could be performed early in pregnancy and was safe. Participants had a preference for being given information about NIPD and test results by a healthcare professional experienced in genetic testing and with specialist knowledge about their condition, rather than a general practitioner or midwife who may not have the same level of knowledge. Women also valued receiving their test results by telephone.
CONCLUSION: Women were overwhelmingly positive about their experience of NIPD, which suggests that current delivery of this service in England is acceptable to these patients who are at high risk of sex-linked genetic disorders. They particularly valued expert counselling both before and after testing, emphasising that it should be offered through specialist services.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573474     DOI: 10.1002/pd.3893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  15 in total

Review 1.  The amniotic fluid transcriptome as a guide to understanding fetal disease.

Authors:  Lillian M Zwemer; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Discrepancy in fetal sex assignment between cell free fetal DNA and ultrasound.

Authors:  J I Iruretagoyena; M Grady; D Shah
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice?

Authors:  Caroline Silcock; Lih-Mei Liao; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

5.  The use of cffDNA in fetal sex determination during the first trimester of pregnancy of female DMD carriers.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Qiaofang Hou; Tao Li; Yan Chu; Qiannan Guo; Bing Kang; Shixiu Liao
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2012-11

6.  Demographic and experiential correlates of public attitudes towards cell-free fetal DNA screening.

Authors:  Lauren C Sayres; Megan Allyse; Taylor A Goodspeed; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability.

Authors:  Joanne B Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics.

Authors:  Zuzana Deans; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty; Celine Lewis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Client views and attitudes to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for sickle cell disease, thalassaemia and cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Cecilia Compton; Madhavi Karunaratna; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.