Literature DB >> 9788556

Determinants of parental decisions after the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.

R L Kramer1, R K Jarve, Y Yaron, M P Johnson, J Lampinen, S B Kasperski, M I Evans.   

Abstract

We evaluated demographic factors and factors specific to the current pregnancy, and their relationship to the decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. All cases of Down syndrome (DS) managed at a tertiary care center from 1989-1997 were retrospectively analyzed with respect to maternal age, parity, gestational age, sonographic findings, insurance status, and race. Of 145 cases of trisomy 21, 19 (13.1%) of women chose continuation of pregnancy, while 126 (86.9%) chose termination. There were no differences between groups in parity, sonographic findings, insurance status, or race at the time of diagnosis. However, patients who chose termination were significantly older and earlier in gestation than those electing to continue their pregnancy. When Down syndrome is diagnosed prenatally, the choice of termination is related to maternal age and gestational age, but only gestational age is a significant independent predictor of pregnancy termination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9788556     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19980923)79:3<172::aid-ajmg4>3.0.co;2-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  9 in total

1.  Experiences of prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida or hydrocephalus in parents who decide to continue with their pregnancy.

Authors:  Julie Chaplin; Robert Schweitzer; Shelley Perkoulidis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Socially repugnant or the standard of care: Is there a distinction between sex-selective and ability-selective abortion?

Authors:  Rebecca Lobo; Garnett Genuis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Demographic and experiential correlates of public attitudes towards cell-free fetal DNA screening.

Authors:  Lauren C Sayres; Megan Allyse; Taylor A Goodspeed; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Trends in survival among children with Down syndrome in 10 regions of the United States.

Authors:  James E Kucik; Mikyong Shin; Csaba Siffel; Lisa Marengo; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Complicated grief after traumatic loss: a 14-month follow up study.

Authors:  Anette Kersting; K Kroker; J Steinhard; K Lüdorff; U Wesselmann; P Ohrmann; V Arolt; T Suslow
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First Trimester Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening for Fetal Trisomies in the United States.

Authors:  Brandon S Walker; Richard E Nelson; Brian R Jackson; David G Grenache; Edward R Ashwood; Robert L Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study.

Authors:  Judith L S Budd; Elizabeth S Draper; Robyn R Lotto; Laura E Berry; Lucy K Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  Pregnancy Outcome following Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Anomaly: A Record Linkage Study of 26,261 Pregnancies.

Authors:  Myrthe Jacobs; Sally-Ann Cooper; Ruth McGowan; Scott M Nelson; Jill P Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.