Literature DB >> 14742885

Technical standardization for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

.   

Abstract

Clinical applications of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) should be updated periodically to address new technologies and inconsistencies in the use of existing technologies. The 2003 Position Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry addressed issues regarding hip and forearm regions of interest (ROIs), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), quality assurance (QA), precision, and cross-calibration. Data are insufficient to determine whether the mean T-score of both hips can be used for diagnosis. However, the mean bone mineral density of both hips can be used for monitoring. The 33% radius is the preferred forearm ROI for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Data are insufficient to determine indications and clinical utility of VFA. Minimum standards for a QA program were established. Phantom scanning should be performed at least once per week. Precision assessment should use patients representative of a DXA center's patient population. If a center has more than one technologist, then the average precision may be used. Repeat precision assessment is necessary if a new DXA system is installed or a technologist's skills have changed. Knowledge of precision is critical to DXA interpretation, and approval from an institutional review board should not be required. Practical standardized procedures for cross-calibration of DXA systems should be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14742885     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:7:1:27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  11 in total

1.  Patient variables impact lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry precision.

Authors:  R D Blank; D G Malone; R C Christian; N L Vallarta-Ast; D C Krueger; M K Drezner; N C Binkley; K E Hansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Cross-calibration and comparison of variability in 2 bone densitometers in a research setting: the framingham experience.

Authors:  David R Gagnon; Robert R McLean; Marian T Hannan; L Adrienne Cupples; Mary Hogan; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Prevalence of low central bone mineral density in a Bulgarian female referral population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mihail A Boyanov
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Gemstone spectral imaging for measuring adult bone mineral density.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Shao; Dian-Mei Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries.

Authors:  Ae Ja Park; Jee-Hye Choi; Hyun Kang; Ki Jeong Park; Ha Young Kim; Seo Hwa Kim; Deog-Yoon Kim; Seung-Hwan Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2015-05-31

6.  Transiliac bone biopsy in osteoporosis: frequency, indications, consequences and complications. An evaluation of 99 consecutive cases over a period of 14 years.

Authors:  P H Kann; A Pfützner; G Delling; G Schulz; S Meyer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Validation of a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis device for the assessment of body composition in older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Assaf Buch; Arie Ben-Yehuda; Vanessa Rouach; Andrea B Maier; Yona Greenman; Elena Izkhakov; Naftali Stern; Roy Eldor
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.725

Review 8.  Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Special report on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  E M Lewiecki; D L Kendler; G M Kiebzak; P Schmeer; R L Prince; G El-Hajj Fuleihan; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Quality Control of DXA System and Precision Test of Radio-technologists.

Authors:  Ho-Sung Kim; Seoung-Oh Yang
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.