Literature DB >> 24706605

Systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate potential recruitment to dementia intervention studies.

Claudia Cooper1, Daniel Ketley, Gill Livingston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the proportion of people with dementia who are eligible for and willing to participate in intervention studies.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed 12 studies fitting predetermined criteria, reporting eligibility or participation rates for dementia intervention trials or intervention studies that sought to increase recruitment. We assessed the study validity using a checklist, reported trial eligibility and participation rates and meta-analysed these where appropriate.
RESULTS: In higher quality studies, 26% [95% confidence interval 19-35%] of people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) attending memory clinics or receiving antidementia medication were eligible for industry drug trials, and 43% of eligible people agreed to participate in one study, suggesting 11% of these populations would take part in drug trials if approached. There was replicated, higher quality evidence that younger people, men and those with more education were more likely to be eligible for AD drug trials. No randomised controlled trials have investigated how to increase recruitment to dementia intervention studies.
CONCLUSION: One in 10 people with AD or taking donepezil would, according to best available evidence, take part in industry drug trials if approached. We found no data regarding non-pharmacological intervention or pragmatic drug trial recruitment, but eligibility and participation rates for these studies are probably higher. If international studies are extrapolated to the UK, they suggest the national target of recruiting 10% of people with dementia diagnoses to research may be achieved through a nationwide policy of asking all people with dementia and their carers for consent to be approached for research participation.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consumer participation; inequalities; patient selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24706605     DOI: 10.1002/gps.4034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0885-6230            Impact factor:   3.485


  16 in total

1.  Motivators for Alzheimer's disease clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Shoshana H Bardach; Sarah D Holmes; Gregory A Jicha
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Challenges to recruitment of participants with MCI in a multicentric neuropsychological study.

Authors:  Michela Brambilla; Mario A Parra; Sergio Della Sala; Federica Alemanno; Simone Pomati
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Polypharmacy and medication regimen complexity as factors associated with staff informant rated quality of life in residents of aged care facilities: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Samanta Lalic; Kris M Jamsen; Barbara C Wimmer; Edwin C K Tan; Sarah N Hilmer; Leonie Robson; Tina Emery; J Simon Bell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Developing the New Interventions for independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) theoretical model for supporting people to live well with dementia at home for longer: a systematic review of theoretical models and Randomised Controlled Trial evidence.

Authors:  Kathryn Lord; Jules Beresford-Dent; Penny Rapaport; Alex Burton; Monica Leverton; Kate Walters; Iain Lang; Murna Downs; Jill Manthorpe; Sue Boex; Joy Jackson; Margaret Ogden; Claudia Cooper
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Characteristics associated with willingness to participate in a randomized controlled behavioral clinical trial using home-based personal computers and a webcam.

Authors:  Hiroko H Dodge; Yuriko Katsumata; Jian Zhu; Nora Mattek; Molly Bowman; Mattie Gregor; Katherine Wild; Jeffrey A Kaye
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  David White; Daniel Hind
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  High blood pressure predicts hippocampal atrophy rate in cognitively impaired elders.

Authors:  Cassidy M Fiford; Jennifer M Nicholas; Geert Jan Biessels; Christopher A Lane; M Jorge Cardoso; Josephine Barnes
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2020-05-17

8.  Psychological interventions to improve psychological well-being in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Paul Farrand; Justin Matthews; Chris Dickens; Martin Anderson; Joanne Woodford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy in people with dementia: feasibility study.

Authors:  Veronika van der Wardt; Jennifer K Burton; Simon Conroy; Tomas Welsh; Pip Logan; Jaspal Taggar; Lukasz Tanajewski; John Gladman
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-01-09

Review 10.  Systematic review of the effective components of psychosocial interventions delivered by care home staff to people with dementia.

Authors:  Penny Rapaport; Gill Livingston; Joanna Murray; Aasiya Mulla; Claudia Cooper
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.