Literature DB >> 33052589

Challenges to recruitment of participants with MCI in a multicentric neuropsychological study.

Michela Brambilla1, Mario A Parra2, Sergio Della Sala3, Federica Alemanno4, Simone Pomati5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on recruitment of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) samples are seldom reported and this issue can be an important source of research waste. AIM: To describe the recruitment challenges and reasons for non-eligibility faced during a bi-centre clinical study assessing the predictive value of a neuropsychological battery of the progression to dementia.
METHODS: Potential MCI participants were identified from databases of the two memory clinics based in Milan (Italy) and invited to the screening assessment.
RESULTS: About 50% of the cases initially identified were ineligible according to inclusion/exclusion criteria and the two sites took 22 months to recruit the planned 150 people. The main reasons for non-eligibility were the MMSE score (41%), age (14%), presence of cerebrovascular disorders (9%), perceptual deficits (6%), neurological (6%) or psychiatric (4%) comorbidities and low education (5%).
CONCLUSION: Awareness of the reasons for exclusion and of the time needed to recruit the planned sample would provide hints for the planning of future studies on MCI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Eligibility; MCI; Neuropsychology; Recruitment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33052589     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01729-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  10 in total

1.  Recruitment rates in gerontological research: the situation for drug trials in dementia may be worse than previously reported.

Authors:  J Cohen-Mansfield
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 2.  Mild cognitive impairment: disparity of incidence and prevalence estimates.

Authors:  Alex Ward; H Michael Arrighi; Shannon Michels; Jesse M Cedarbaum
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Outer and inner tolerance limits: their usefulness for the construction of norms and the standardization of neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Erminio Capitani; Marcella Laiacona
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment improves diagnostic precision, biomarker associations, and progression rates.

Authors:  Mark W Bondi; Emily C Edmonds; Amy J Jak; Lindsay R Clark; Lisa Delano-Wood; Carrie R McDonald; Daniel A Nation; David J Libon; Rhoda Au; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Free and cued selective reminding test predicts progression to Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Giulia Grande; Nicola Vanacore; Davide L Vetrano; Ilaria Cova; Debora Rizzuto; Flavia Mayer; Laura Maggiore; Roberta Ghiretti; Valentina Cucumo; Claudio Mariani; Stefano F Cappa; Simone Pomati
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Reasons that prevent the inclusion of Alzheimer's disease patients in clinical trials.

Authors:  Adeline Rollin-Sillaire; Laetitia Breuilh; Julia Salleron; Stéphanie Bombois; Pascaline Cassagnaud; Vincent Deramecourt; Marie-Anne Mackowiak; Florence Pasquier
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Disease-modifying properties of long-term lithium treatment for amnestic mild cognitive impairment: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Orestes V Forlenza; Breno S Diniz; Márcia Radanovic; Franklin S Santos; Leda L Talib; Wagner F Gattaz
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 8.  Mild cognitive impairment--beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  B Winblad; K Palmer; M Kivipelto; V Jelic; L Fratiglioni; L-O Wahlund; A Nordberg; L Bäckman; M Albert; O Almkvist; H Arai; H Basun; K Blennow; M de Leon; C DeCarli; T Erkinjuntti; E Giacobini; C Graff; J Hardy; C Jack; A Jorm; K Ritchie; C van Duijn; P Visser; R C Petersen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate potential recruitment to dementia intervention studies.

Authors:  Claudia Cooper; Daniel Ketley; Gill Livingston
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.485

10.  Lay perspectives of successful ageing: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Theodore D Cosco; A Matthew Prina; Jaime Perales; Blossom C M Stephan; Carol Brayne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.