Literature DB >> 24700414

Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host-guest binding energies.

Paulius Mikulskis1, Daniela Cioloboc, Milica Andrejić, Sakshi Khare, Joakim Brorsson, Samuel Genheden, Ricardo A Mata, Pär Söderhjelm, Ulf Ryde.   

Abstract

We have estimated free energies for the binding of nine cyclic carboxylate guest molecules to the octa-acid host in the SAMPL4 blind-test challenge with four different approaches. First, we used standard free-energy perturbation calculations of relative binding affinities, performed at the molecular-mechanics (MM) level with TIP3P waters, the GAFF force field, and two different sets of charges for the host and the guest, obtained either with the restrained electrostatic potential or AM1-BCC methods. Both charge sets give good and nearly identical results, with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 4 kJ/mol and a correlation coefficient (R (2)) of 0.8 compared to experimental results. Second, we tried to improve these predictions with 28,800 density-functional theory (DFT) calculations for selected snapshots and the non-Boltzmann Bennett acceptance-ratio method, but this led to much worse results, probably because of a too large difference between the MM and DFT potential-energy functions. Third, we tried to calculate absolute affinities using minimised DFT structures. This gave intermediate-quality results with MADs of 5-9 kJ/mol and R (2) = 0.6-0.8, depending on how the structures were obtained. Finally, we tried to improve these results using local coupled-cluster calculations with single and double excitations, and non-iterative perturbative treatment of triple excitations (LCCSD(T0)), employing the polarisable multipole interactions with supermolecular pairs approach. Unfortunately, this only degraded the predictions, probably because of a mismatch between the solvation energies obtained at the DFT and LCCSD(T0) levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24700414     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9739-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  49 in total

1.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Nonlinear scaling schemes for Lennard-Jones interactions in free energy calculations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; David L Mobley; David A Case
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  How accurate can a force field become? A polarizable multipole model combined with fragment-wise quantum-mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Pär Söderhjelm; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory.

Authors:  Stefan Grimme; Stephan Ehrlich; Lars Goerigk
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Paradynamics: an effective and reliable model for ab initio QM/MM free-energy calculations and related tasks.

Authors:  Nikolay V Plotnikov; Shina C L Kamerlin; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  Statistical mechanics and molecular dynamics in evaluating thermodynamic properties of biomolecular recognition.

Authors:  Jeff Wereszczynski; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  Guests of Differing Polarities Provide Insight into Structural Requirements for Templates of Water-Soluble Nano-Capsules.

Authors:  Corinne L D Gibb; Bruce C Gibb
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 2.457

Review 9.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 10.  Theory of free energy and entropy in noncovalent binding.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.622

View more
  32 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparison of Methods To Reweight from Classical Molecular Simulations to QM/MM Potentials.

Authors:  Eric C Dybeck; Gerhard König; Bernard R Brooks; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Effect of explicit water molecules on ligand-binding affinities calculated with the MM/GBSA approach.

Authors:  Paulius Mikulskis; Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations: an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Jing Huang; Andrew C Simmonett; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Pavlo O Dral; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael Jones; Yihan Shao; Walter Thiel; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pK a corrections.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Jay W Ponder; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Frank C Pickard Iv; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.