Literature DB >> 24869780

Effect of explicit water molecules on ligand-binding affinities calculated with the MM/GBSA approach.

Paulius Mikulskis1, Samuel Genheden, Ulf Ryde.   

Abstract

We tested different approaches to including the effect of binding-site water molecules for ligand-binding affinities within the MM/GBSA approach (molecular mechanics combined with generalised Born and surface-area solvation). As a test case, we studied the binding of nine phenol analogues to ferritin. The effect of water molecules mediating the interaction between the receptor and the ligand can be studied by considering a few water molecules as a part of the receptor. We extended previous methods by allowing for a variable number of water molecules in the binding site. The effect of displaced water molecules can also be considered within the MM/GBSA philosophy by calculating the affinities of binding-site water molecules, both before and after binding of the ligand. To obtain proper energies, both the water molecules and the ligand need then to be converted to non-interacting ghost molecules and a single-average approach (i.e., the same structures are used for bound and unbound states) based on the simulations of both the complex and the free receptor can be used to improve the precision. The only problem is to estimate the free energy of an unbound water molecule. With an experimental estimate of this parameter, promising results were obtained for our test case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24869780     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2273-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  69 in total

1.  Self-Consistent Reaction Field Model for Aqueous and Nonaqueous Solutions Based on Accurate Polarized Partial Charges.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Marenich; Ryan M Olson; Casey P Kelly; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

Review 3.  Physics-based methods for studying protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2007-05

4.  Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Tom Young; Ramy Farid; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  High-energy water sites determine peptide binding affinity and specificity of PDZ domains.

Authors:  Thijs Beuming; Ramy Farid; Woody Sherman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  The role of water molecules in computational drug design.

Authors:  Stephanie B A de Beer; Nico P E Vermeulen; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Paulius Mikulskis; LiHong Hu; Jacob Kongsted; Pär Söderhjelm; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Loss of translational entropy in binding, folding, and catalysis.

Authors:  L M Amzel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997-06

9.  The normal-mode entropy in the MM/GBSA method: effect of system truncation, buffer region, and dielectric constant.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Oliver Kuhn; Paulius Mikulskis; Daniel Hoffmann; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Sergio Decherchi; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.098

3.  Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study.

Authors:  Matteo Aldeghi; Michael J Bodkin; Stefan Knapp; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Small Molecules Targeting the Inactive Form of the Mnk1/2 Kinases.

Authors:  Srinivasaraghavan Kannan; Mohan R Pradhan; Joseph Cherian; Thomas L Joseph; Zhi Ying Poh; Yang Hai Yan; Ho Melvyn; Liu Boping; Hill Jeffrey; Kassoum Nacro; Chandra S Verma
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-11-14

5.  Mutations responsible for the carbapenemase activity of SME-1.

Authors:  Vidhu Agarwal; Akhilesh Tiwari; Pritish Varadwaj
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  An Efficient Implementation of the Nwat-MMGBSA Method to Rescore Docking Results in Medium-Throughput Virtual Screenings.

Authors:  Irene Maffucci; Xiao Hu; Valentina Fumagalli; Alessandro Contini
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.221

7.  Reliable In Silico Ranking of Engineered Therapeutic TCR Binding Affinities with MMPB/GBSA.

Authors:  Rory M Crean; Christopher R Pudney; David K Cole; Marc W van der Kamp
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.