Literature DB >> 24699371

Query Health: standards-based, cross-platform population health surveillance.

Jeffrey G Klann1, Michael D Buck2, Jeffrey Brown3, Marc Hadley4, Richard Elmore5, Griffin M Weber6, Shawn N Murphy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Understanding population-level health trends is essential to effectively monitor and improve public health. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) Query Health initiative is a collaboration to develop a national architecture for distributed, population-level health queries across diverse clinical systems with disparate data models. Here we review Query Health activities, including a standards-based methodology, an open-source reference implementation, and three pilot projects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Query Health defined a standards-based approach for distributed population health queries, using an ontology based on the Quality Data Model and Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture, Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) as the query language, the Query Envelope as the secure transport layer, and the Quality Reporting Document Architecture as the result language.
RESULTS: We implemented this approach using Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) and hQuery for data analytics and PopMedNet for access control, secure query distribution, and response. We deployed the reference implementation at three pilot sites: two public health departments (New York City and Massachusetts) and one pilot designed to support Food and Drug Administration post-market safety surveillance activities. The pilots were successful, although improved cross-platform data normalization is needed. DISCUSSIONS: This initiative resulted in a standards-based methodology for population health queries, a reference implementation, and revision of the HQMF standard. It also informed future directions regarding interoperability and data access for ONC's Data Access Framework initiative.
CONCLUSIONS: Query Health was a test of the learning health system that supplied a functional methodology and reference implementation for distributed population health queries that has been validated at three sites. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Database Management Systems; Healthcare Quality Assessment; Medical Informatics; Public Health Informatics; Systems Integration

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699371      PMCID: PMC4078284          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


Background and significance

The Institute of Medicine has developed a vision for a learning health system (LHS), which will integrate the nation's electronic healthcare components to share and learn from each other.1 An initial step toward this is the Meaningful Use Incentive Program (MU), which encourages the adoption and use of electronic health systems. This is laying groundwork for LHS, which will cross organizational boundaries for tasks such as comparative effectiveness research, population health surveillance, and dissemination of evidence-based medicine. As the Institute of Medicine describes it: ‘The increased complexity of health care requires a sustainable system that gets the right care to the right people when they need it, and then captures the results for improvement. The nation needs a healthcare system that learns.’2 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has embraced LHS in their strategic plan.3 As a large-scale test of LHS functionality, they launched the Query Health initiative in September 2011. Query Health is a public–private collaboration to develop standards and services to enable distributed, secure, standards-based population health measurement.4 This capability to measure population-level health trends is essential to public health. The ONC embraced a distributed query model in Query Health, which eliminates centralization of data by ‘bringing questions to the data.’ Individual organizations process queries and disclose only the minimum necessary information to answer the query—often aggregate statistics—avoiding many privacy and security concerns. This federated approach—which requires deep content and system knowledge of the contributing health systems5—is nonetheless being used effectively for research, cohort selection, and population health surveillance.6–14 Over the past 2 years, Query Health has developed a methodology and a flexible, open-source reference implementation.15–24 We have piloted the implementation at several locations and collected feedback, which is guiding future work on a national scale.25 26

Objective

Query Health was tasked with three major goals. First, to define a methodology for distributed, secure, standards-based clinical queries. Existing standards were used wherever possible. Second, to develop a reference implementation using best-of-breed technological components.27 Third, to implement components of this reference implementation at three pilot sites, to gauge the effectiveness of Query Health in real-world healthcare scenarios.22 Two of the pilots were in cooperation with Departments of Health (New York City and Massachusetts) for disease monitoring and surveillance. The third pilot focused on the potential to expand the data resources available for medical product safety surveillance through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Mini-Sentinel project.28

Materials and methods

The general Query Health workflow is as follows: (1) investigators develop ‘questions’ to ask the data using a standard ontology and query format; (2) the question is securely distributed through a ‘query envelope’ to participating data partners; (3) data partners process the query and return aggregate results; (4) results are combined and reported back to the investigator (figure 1).
Figure 1

Overall design of Query Health. Various stakeholders can develop queries, which are distributed securely and sent to a variety of data partners. These data partners process the queries and return aggregate counts, so that sensitive data never leave individual sites. Query Health uses a variety of standards: a Query Envelope, a Data Model, Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF), and Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA).

Overall design of Query Health. Various stakeholders can develop queries, which are distributed securely and sent to a variety of data partners. These data partners process the queries and return aggregate counts, so that sensitive data never leave individual sites. Query Health uses a variety of standards: a Query Envelope, a Data Model, Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF), and Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA).

Ontology

The Query Health ontology uses the Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) to instantiate a hierarchical terminology based on the National Quality Forum's Quality Data Model (QDM).15 These standards are already required as part of the 2014 certification for stage 2 of MU, so implementers are encouraged to use these standards instead of deriving new models. C-CDA is used to produce reports of patient data, and QDM defines data elements required for clinical quality measures (CQMs).29 30 The reason for using this approach is summarized well in the 2014 Electronic Health Record (EHR) Certification Final Rule: ‘this standard provides, for the first time, a method of moving a ‘snapshot’ of patient data from one EHR technology to another without loss of semantic integrity.’31

Query format

The Health Level 7 (HL7) Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) is Query Health's ‘question language’. HQMF is an XML standard for platform-neutral clinical queries, which already has national focus and adoption because of MU. The National Quality Forum and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are using it and have released many of their CQMs in HQMF format.32 33 It is possible that HQMF will appear in the MU stage 3 requirements. Despite the national attention, HQMF had inadequate computability in 2011. Query Health worked with HL7 to develop a second revision of HQMF that balances the flexibility needed by query developers and the computational tractability needed in implementations. This revision will be available through HL7 shortly and will be used for future HQMF-based CQMs.34 In addition to the new HQMF format, a forthcoming HQMF QDM implementation guide will enumerate implementation details of using the Query Health ontology with HQMF.35

Query transport

The Query Health Query Envelope standard supports secure transport of queries and results through a distributed network. It provides very granular control to data partners to authorize or decline data release, and it is independent of query and result formats. It is a flexible, secure transport mechanism.36

Results format

The HL7 Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA) is Query Health's ‘result language’. QRDA is another platform-neutral XML language based on the HL7 Reference Implementation Model and is already required for quality reporting in MU stage 2.30

Evaluation

We implemented this methodology as a flexible reference implementation using adaptable, best-of-breed, open-source technologies. Figure 2 is a summary of this implementation. We then piloted the reference implementation at three sites using different components for each use case. We collected feedback on the implementation and pilot experiences. Table 1 is a summary of this evaluation.
Figure 2

The technologies used in the Query Health reference implementation. Individual pilots varied in their use of these components (see Table 1). Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) is used as a graphical query composer. PopMedNet is the query distribution and authentication engine. i2b2 and hQuery are the back-end data warehouses used by data partners to connect to Query Health. A Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) is used to communicate queries in a standardized format.

Table 1

Summary of the three Query Health pilots

Pilot siteGoal and feedbackTechnologyStatus
New York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneInitial goal: Demonstrate standards-based vendor-neutral distributed analytics solution using Query Health StandardsCurrent goal: Launch health information exchange-based solution to obtain aggregate city-wide healthcare statisticsFeedback: Standards-based aggregate distributed analytic solutions are now capable of delivering valuable results. Challenges remain in cross-site data harmonizationComposer: i2b2Envelope: PopMedNetProcessor: i2b2Other: HQMF, OntologyInitial pilot: Complete.Second phase: Q2 2014
FDA Mini-SentinelGoal: Expand medical product safety surveillance capabilities to i2b2 clinical data sourcesFeedback: Clinical data sources can provide important additional data for medical product safety surveillance. Resources required for data normalization and maintaining additional software at data partners must be carefully consideredComposer: i2b2Envelope: PopMedNetProcessor: i2b2Other: HQMFThree-month trial complete
MDPHnetGoal: Implement Query Envelope security and authentication in existing public health surveillance networkFeedback: The Query Envelope enhancements provide standards-based approach for distribution of queries and return of resultsComposer: PopMedNetEnvelope: PopMedNetProcessor: EHR Support for Public Health (ESP)Other: (n/a)Successful, incorporated into subsequent PopMedNet software releases
Summary of the three Query Health pilots The technologies used in the Query Health reference implementation. Individual pilots varied in their use of these components (see Table 1). Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) is used as a graphical query composer. PopMedNet is the query distribution and authentication engine. i2b2 and hQuery are the back-end data warehouses used by data partners to connect to Query Health. A Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) is used to communicate queries in a standardized format.

Results

Implementation

PopMedNet

For query transport, PopMedNet was selected. PopMedNet is an open-source distributed data-sharing platform funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the FDA, ONC, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).16 37 It is a key component of several large-scale distributed networks, including the FDA Mini-Sentinel, the NIH Health Care System Research Collaboratory Distributed Research Network, and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health MDPHnet system.9–11 PopMedNet will be used by the newly funded Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) to help create and operate a ‘network-of-networks’ to support clinical research.38 PopMedNet defines a network topology, manages access controls, distributes queries to participating partner sites for local execution, and manages the query response. It is agnostic to query, response, and data formats, making it ideal for integration with disparate systems. The PopMedNet architecture enables synchronous or asynchronous distributed querying, enables partners to opt-in to each query or type of query (via an access control layer), and allows partners to use to their internal workflow for query response. Each PopMedNet query includes query metadata that we extended to conform to the Query Health Query Envelope standards. Each query is defined at a central PopMedNet portal, securely distributed using the Query Envelope, ‘unpacked’ at the participating site, and processed locally by a Data Mart Client program that manages the local execution and response. The query response is also packaged into the Query Envelope for return to the requester via PopMedNet.

i2b2

For query composition and processing, Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) was selected. i2b2 is an open-source clinical data analytics platform funded by the NIH and used at over 100 sites nationwide.39 40 It provides an intuitive, graphical, web-based query builder as well as a flexible analytical database design. Its component-based architecture makes it easily adaptable to new-use cases, and it has already been used in another distributed query platform called SHRINE, the Shared Health Research Information Network.6 Over a third of PCORI's PCORnet is currently using i2b2, including both Clinical Data Research Networks and Patient-Powered Research Networks. Harvard's PCORnet Clinical Data Research Network involves the interoperability of i2b2 at 10 health systems.38 41 i2b2 is a set of web service components, known as cells, that collectively make up a ‘hive’. It is possible to add and remove components for different use cases of i2b2. To Query Health-enable i2b2, we created three new cells: A PopMedNet client adapter, which sends investigator-developed queries to the PopMedNet web portal. A PopMedNet server adapter, which receives queries from and sends results back to PopMedNet. An HQMF translator, able to process HQMF revision 2. These cells integrate into the hive. This is described below and shown in figures 3 and 4. The i2b2 platform and these cells are open-source.15 17
Figure 3

The Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) Query Composer. Queries are composed in the graphical i2b2 query builder using the Query Health Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) data model. These queries are sent to the PopMedNet (PMN) client adapter, which translates the query into a Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) and sends it to the PopMedNet portal for distribution.

Figure 4

The Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) Query Processing Engine. At each data partner using i2b2, the PopMedNet Data Mart Client sends a Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) query to an i2b2 instance with a PopMedNet (PMN) server adapter, which translates the query into i2b2 format for execution. Results are returned in i2b2 XML format to the Data Mart Client by way of the server.

The Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) Query Composer. Queries are composed in the graphical i2b2 query builder using the Query Health Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) data model. These queries are sent to the PopMedNet (PMN) client adapter, which translates the query into a Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) and sends it to the PopMedNet portal for distribution. The Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) Query Processing Engine. At each data partner using i2b2, the PopMedNet Data Mart Client sends a Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) query to an i2b2 instance with a PopMedNet (PMN) server adapter, which translates the query into i2b2 format for execution. Results are returned in i2b2 XML format to the Data Mart Client by way of the server. When an investigator develops a query in the Query Health i2b2 query builder, the query is sent to the PopMedNet Client Adapter rather than the local data repository. This Adapter then transmits the query (which is in an i2b2-compliant XML format) to the HQMF translator, and it sends the resulting HQMF query onward to the PopMedNet portal. The query builder then displays results as they arrive in the ‘previous queries’ window (figure 3). When a Query Health-enabled i2b2 system is sent an HQMF query by the PopMedNet Data Mart Client, it is routed to the PopMedNet Server Adapter, which similarly sends the query to the HQMF translator for translation back into i2b2 format. The Adapter then sends the query to the standard set of i2b2 services for processing. When processing is completed, the Adapter passes the results back to the PopMedNet Data Mart Client. We did not implement QRDA translation in this version of the reference implementation—results are transmitted in i2b2 XML format. Details on the HQMF translator service have been described elsewhere.42 We found that HQMF must be tightly constrained to ensure it represents a functional, automatable query that can be represented within a set of data structures. Implementation guides and harmonization efforts within HL7 will improve this process, but the complexity of existing CQMs might prove computationally problematic. The HQMF translator relies on an implementation of the Query Health data ontology, which we implemented using the i2b2 ontology cell. This makes extensive use of ‘modifiers’, which were introduced to i2b2 in 2012. They allow additional information about core data elements, such as medication route and dose, by storing attributes about individual patient observations. We found that they are a very powerful and efficient way of adding metadata to observations in star schema databases.

hQuery

An alternative data source for query processing was also selected: the hQuery Gateway, developed by MITRE. hQuery is a document database that uses JavaScript-based map-reduce queries to efficiently search Continuity of Care Documents (CCDs).43 hQuery was not used in a formal pilot, but demonstrating that two very different data sources can both process HQMF makes a strong case for the interoperability of HQMF. Funding for hQuery ceased in 2012 and it is no longer officially supported, but Scoop Health is developing an alternate version of hQuery. We developed two new components for hQuery: A module to convert HQMF queries into native hQuery JavaScript queries, able to process both HQMF revision 1 and 2.18 Integration with PopMedNet to enable hQuery to accept queries from and return the results to the sender. When a Query Health-enabled hQuery Gateway receives an HQMF query via PopMedNet, it is converted into the native JavaScript query format, executed, and results are returned to PopMedNet. Results also do not use QRDA format in this version; instead they are presented in the native hQuery JSON format. We experienced similar difficulties with the complexity of HQMF in implementing the translator to JavaScript. However, the native map-reduce-based query format used by hQuery did eventually permit translation of fairly complex queries. The translator was used in development and testing of the new HQMF standard and is now being used at Research And Development (RAND) Corporation to develop an HQMF to SQL translator that will be applicable to multiple relational database systems.

Pilots

New York City Department of Health

The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYCDOHMH) currently has a network of over 650 primary care practices that respond to distributed queries. This enables their teams of quality improvement specialists to provide regular feedback to the practices in order to respond to public health concerns for both chronic and acute conditions.7 However, their current system architecture uses proprietary technology that is vendor-specific and not standards-based. Therefore, the Department is adopting the Query Health platform to add additional practices and health information exchange organizations that are using a wide variety of health information systems. In 2012, the NYCDOHMH conducted a small pilot of Query Health across three eClinicalWorks EHR practices’ test systems. In the pilot, a public health investigator would develop a query in a central i2b2 query builder. This was transmitted to the PopMedNet portal, which distributed the query to the three participating partner sites (Data Marts). Once the query reached and was accepted by a Data Mart, a local i2b2 instance executed the query against the i2b2 data repository. This i2b2 data repository contained a Query Health data model populated with EHR test patients. The practice's result was then transmitted back through PopMedNet, which aggregated the results across practices for viewing in the i2b2 query builder. This pilot found that, like their existing distributed network, Query Health's simple aggregate counts can successfully provide valuable cross-practice insight with the added benefit of being a standards-based technology solution. In October 2013, NYCDOHMH completed a prototype test of a Query Health-based solution for analyzing the data found within the New York statewide health information exchange (SHIN-NY). In this solution, an aggregate patient CCD is retrieved across the participating exchange partners and loaded into the i2b2 C-CDA system for aggregate querying. Full production release of this system is scheduled for early 2014. It is anticipated that it will provide significant insights into the quality of care delivered particularly in the inpatient settings, which will complement the existing primary care setting solution. Using both systems together will also permit comparisons of Query Health's accuracy, speed, stability, and capabilities. It is worth noting that despite the use of standards, we anticipate that significant work reconciling the various implementations of the data elements and value sets across institutions will remain.

FDA

The FDA's Mini-Sentinel project aims to monitor medical product safety using electronic health data.44 Mini-Sentinel is using Query Health standards implemented through PopMedNet for distributed querying and receiving results within a network of over 130 million individuals.9 The Query Health pilot investigates adding i2b2 clinical data repositories to the Mini-Sentinel network to expand the medical product safety monitoring capabilities of the network. The FDA Mini-Sentinel Operations Center team at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute (HPHCI) partnered with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) and Lincoln Peak Partners (the PopMedNet technology partner) to implement the pilot. The i2b2 implementation at BIDMC was the target of the query. The overall architecture of this pilot was very similar to the New York City pilot—using i2b2, HQMF, and PopMedNet. Also, BIDMC used an i2b2 structure compatible with the Query Health data model. Therefore this pilot's implementation of the reference implementation was fairly straightforward. However, BIDMC did not have resources to host the PopMedNet Data Mart Client software locally. Therefore a new network architecture was developed in which the Data Mart Client was installed securely in the cloud rather than behind the firewall at BIDMC, while the i2b2 data remained behind the BIDMC firewall. Queries were delivered to BIDMC via a secure virtual private network tunnel. This architecture avoided the needed to install the PopMedNet software within BIDMC, but still gave BIDMC the ability to review queries before execution and review responses before release. Because only aggregate counts passed through the tunnel, BIDMC viewed this architecture as no more of a security risk than if the software were installed behind their firewall. This pilot was time-limited based on the agreement between HPHCI and BIDMC and was shut down after approximately 3 months of running successfully, but was memorialized in a video available on YouTube.45 The pilot demonstrated the feasibility of connecting the FDA Mini-Sentinel network to an i2b2 end point, which could be used to expand Mini-Sentinel to include data from the dozens of healthcare centers that already have their clinical data in i2b2 format.

MDPHnet

MDPHnet is an ONC-funded project overseen by the Massachusetts eHealth Institute in collaboration with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. MDPHnet is a population-based EHR surveillance network targeting a broad array of health indicators across multiple providers and delivery systems. The project integrates two software systems—PopMedNet and EHR Support for Public Health (ESP)46—into a single platform (ESPnet) for population-based surveillance using EHR data.47 The Query Health platform is enabling secure, standardized queries on the same architecture. This pilot focused on fully implementing the Query Envelope standard, to demonstrate its flexibility and granular security control. MDPHnet was already being deployed before Query Health was initiated. This pilot's goal was a technical one only: deployment of a Query Health-compatible version of PopMedNet. This pilot was deployed successfully within MDPHnet and is still being used. The Query Envelope and associated query metadata capture developed as part of this pilot is now integrated fully into the PopMedNet software package and is being used by all PopMedNet-based networks.

Discussion

Query Health is a powerful test of the nation's progress toward an LHS. The initiative has been quite successful: Query Health has created a vendor-neutral, standards-based approach for distributed population health queries; we have delivered an open-source reference implementation with several alternative configurations; we have co-developed a new revision of HQMF; and we have validated our system for three very different use cases. This work demonstrates enthusiastic collaboration for LHS initiatives across several research groups, government entities, and clinical practices.15 17 18 45 Query Health also uncovered a challenge in our electronic healthcare architecture: most clinical systems, unlike those used in the pilots, do not use common data models. To address this concern, the ONC has launched the Data Access Framework (DAF), an initiative to provide standards and implementation guidance for cross-platform normalized data access. DAF is a multilevel initiative that will encompass standards for both intra- and inter-organizational queries on both individuals and populations. This work is a challenging but necessary step before national-scale distributed networks such as Query Health can become viable on a large scale. In the meantime, components of and lessons learned from the Query Health initiative are being used for new initiatives from the reference implementation team. The NIH Health Care System Research Collaboratory is developing new distributed networks powered by PopMedNet, including a deeper integration of PopMedNet and i2b2. A pilot recently demonstrated translation of an MDPHnet query to execute directly against an i2b2 database. Both PopMedNet and i2b2 will also be used by portions of PCORI's PCORnet. The i2b2 community can continue to expand HQMF support as federal guidelines for its use are finalized. The i2b2 implementation of the Query Health ontology is being leveraged to develop CCD import tools, which will allow i2b2 to be deployed more broadly. The New York City pilot is continuing to integrate regional health information exchanges into their Query Health network.

Conclusion

Query Health has created a vendor-neutral, standards-based approach for distributed population health queries. As Query Health evolves, on-the-fly translation between HQMF and local formats may allow interoperability among systems, creating an infrastructure for comprehensive population health queries. Lessons learned from the Query Health experiment are informing the ONC's DAF, which will encourage data availability for future cross-platform use cases. The present reference implementation provides a common set of components for distributed population health queries that has been validated at three sites.
  17 in total

1.  Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Brown; John H Holmes; Kiran Shah; Ken Hall; Ross Lazarus; Richard Platt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Electronic Support for Public Health: validated case finding and reporting for notifiable diseases using electronic medical data.

Authors:  Ross Lazarus; Michael Klompas; Francis X Campion; Scott J N McNabb; Xuanlin Hou; James Daniel; Gillian Haney; Alfred DeMaria; Leslie Lenert; Richard Platt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders.

Authors:  Katherine K Kim; Dennis K Browe; Holly C Logan; Roberta Holm; Lori Hack; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Asking population health's unanswered questions.

Authors:  Jennifer Prestigiacomo
Journal:  Healthc Inform       Date:  2012-09

5.  The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber; Shawn N Murphy; Andrew J McMurry; Douglas Macfadden; Daniel J Nigrin; Susanne Churchill; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology, 2014 edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2012-09-04

7.  Computing health quality measures using Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Klann; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2).

Authors:  Shawn N Murphy; Griffin Weber; Michael Mendis; Vivian Gainer; Henry C Chueh; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Achieving a nationwide learning health system.

Authors:  Charles P Friedman; Adam K Wong; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Federated queries of clinical data repositories: the sum of the parts does not equal the whole.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics: Recent Research and Trends in the United States.

Authors:  B E Dixon; H Kharrazi; H P Lehmann
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  Data interchange using i2b2.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Klann; Aaron Abend; Vijay A Raghavan; Kenneth D Mandl; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  MDPHnet: secure, distributed sharing of electronic health record data for public health surveillance, evaluation, and planning.

Authors:  Joshua Vogel; Jeffrey S Brown; Thomas Land; Richard Platt; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision.

Authors:  B Middleton; D F Sittig; A Wright
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-02

5.  A Consensus-Based Approach for Harmonizing the OHDSI Common Data Model with HL7 FHIR.

Authors:  Guoqian Jiang; Richard C Kiefer; Deepak K Sharma; Eric Prud'hommeaux; Harold R Solbrig
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

6.  Optimizing Enrollment of Patients into Nephrology Research Studies.

Authors:  David T Selewski; Emily G Herreshoff; Debbie S Gipson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Taking advantage of continuity of care documents to populate a research repository.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Klann; Michael Mendis; Lori C Phillips; Alyssa P Goodson; Beatriz H Rocha; Howard S Goldberg; Nich Wattanasin; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Federated queries of clinical data repositories: Scaling to a national network.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  What's Past is Prologue: A Scoping Review of Recent Public Health and Global Health Informatics Literature.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Jamie Pina; Hadi Kharrazi; Fardad Gharghabi; Janise Richards
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2015-07-01

10.  Creating value: unifying silos into public health business intelligence.

Authors:  Arthur J Davidson
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2015-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.