Literature DB >> 25146559

Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia.

D J Butler1, G Ramanathan, C Oliver, A Cole, J Lye, P D Harty, T Wright, D V Webb, D S Followill.   

Abstract

The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) maintains the Australian primary standard of absorbed dose. Until recently, the standard was used to calibrate ionisation chambers only in (60)Co gamma rays. These chambers are then used by radiotherapy clinics to determine linac output, using a correction factor (k Q) to take into account the different spectra of (60)Co and the linac. Over the period 2010-2013, ARPANSA adapted the primary standard to work in megavoltage linac beams, and has developed a calibration service at three photon beams (6, 10 and 18 MV) from an Elekta Synergy linac. We describe the details of the new calibration service, the method validation and the use of the new calibration factors with the International Atomic Energy Agency's TRS-398 dosimetry Code of Practice. The expected changes in absorbed dose measurements in the clinic when shifting from (60)Co to the direct calibration are determined. For a Farmer chamber (model 2571), the measured chamber calibration coefficient is expected to be reduced by 0.4, 1.0 and 1.1 % respectively for these three beams when compared to the factor derived from (60)Co. These results are in overall agreement with international absorbed dose standards and calculations by Muir and Rogers in 2010 of k Q factors using Monte Carlo techniques. The reasons for and against moving to the new service are discussed in the light of the requirements of clinical dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25146559      PMCID: PMC4297255          DOI: 10.1007/s13246-014-0293-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  16 in total

1.  AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.

Authors:  P R Almond; P J Biggs; B M Coursey; W F Hanson; M S Huq; R Nath; D W Rogers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.

Authors:  D I Thwaites; A R DuSautoy; T Jordan; M R McEwen; A Nisbet; A E Nahum; W G Pitchford
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm R McEwen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The 2009 survey of therapy equipment and dosimetry practices in Australian radiotherapy centres.

Authors:  Rhonda L Brown; Duncan J Butler
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.430

5.  Relationship between %dd(10)x and stopping-power ratios for flattening filter free accelerators: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Guoming Xiong; D W O Rogers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.

Authors:  Hugo Palmans; Laila Nafaa; Jans Jo De; Sofie Gillis; Marie-Thérèse Hoornaert; Chantal Martens; Marleen Piessens; Hubert Thierens; Ann Van der Plaetsen; Stefaan Vynckier
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Comparison of the NMIJ and the ARPANSA standards for absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  M Shimizu; Y Morishita; M Kato; T Tanaka; T Kurosawa; N Takata; N Saito; G Ramanathan; P D Harty; C Oliver; T Wright; D J Butler
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Effects of dosimetric and clinical uncertainty on complication-free local tumor control.

Authors:  A L Boyer; T Schultheiss
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of dose-fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases.

Authors:  Jackson Sai-Yiu Wu; Rebecca Wong; Mary Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Timothy Whelan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration.

Authors:  Pablo Castro; Feliciano García-Vicente; Cristina Mínguez; Alejandro Floriano; David Sevillano; Leopoldo Pérez; Juan J Torres
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterisation of a synthetic diamond detector for end-to-end dosimetry in stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery.

Authors:  Maddison Shaw; Jessica Lye; Andrew Alves; Stephanie Keehan; Joerg Lehmann; Maximilian Hanlon; John Kenny; John Baines; Claudiu Porumb; Moshi Geso; Rhonda Brown
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19

2.  Commissioning of a PTW 34070 large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber for small field megavoltage photon dosimetry.

Authors:  Tom Kupfer; Joerg Lehmann; Duncan J Butler; Ganesan Ramanathan; Tracy E Bailey; Rick D Franich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.