Literature DB >> 17599820

Why Barbie feels heavier than Ken: the influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the illusory perception of weight.

Anton J M Dijker1.   

Abstract

In order to examine the relative influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the perceived weight of objects, two studies were performed, using equally weighing dolls differing in sex-related and age-related vulnerability or physical strength cues. To increase variation in perceived size, stimulus objects were viewed through optical lenses of varying reducing power. Different groups of participants were required to provide magnitude estimates of perceived size, physical strength, or weight, or of expected weight. A size-weight illusion (SWI) was demonstrated, such that smaller objects felt heavier than larger ones, that was entirely accounted for by the mediating role of expected weight. Yet, perceived physical strength exerted an additional and more reactive influence on perceived weight independently of measured expectancies. Results are used to clarify the nature of "embodied", internal sensory-motor representations of physical and social properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17599820     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  15 in total

Review 1.  Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The number-weight illusion.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Dennis Reike
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The integration of size and weight cues for perception and action: evidence for a weight-size illusion.

Authors:  Sarah Hirsiger; Kristen Pickett; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Physical Constraints on the Evolution of Cooperation.

Authors:  Anton J M Dijker
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 6.  The role of expectancies in the size-weight illusion: a review of theoretical and empirical arguments and a new explanation.

Authors:  Anton J M Dijker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

7.  Consciousness: a neural capacity for objectivity, especially pronounced in humans.

Authors:  Anton J M Dijker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-17

8.  A mass-density model can account for the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Knut Drewing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low-level sensory processes play a more crucial role than high-level cognitive ones in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Cody G Freeman; Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Size matters: a single representation underlies our perceptions of heaviness in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.