Literature DB >> 24689368

Changes in chemical permeation of disposable latex, nitrile, and vinyl gloves exposed to simulated movement.

Robert N Phalen1, Thi Le, Weng Kee Wong.   

Abstract

Glove movement can affect chemical permeation of organic compounds through polymer glove products. However, conflicting reports make it difficult to compare the effects of movement on chemical permeation through commonly available glove types. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of movement on chemical permeation of an organic solvent through disposable latex, nitrile, and vinyl gloves. Simulated whole-glove permeation testing was conducted using ethyl alcohol and a previously designed permeation test system. With exposure to movement, a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.001) in breakthrough time (BT) was observed for the latex (-23%) and nitrile gloves (-31%). With exposure to movement, only the nitrile glove exhibited a significant increase (p ≤ 0.001) in steady-state permeation rate (+47%) and cumulative permeation at 30 min (+111%). Even though the nitrile glove provided optimum chemical resistance against ethyl alcohol, it was most affected by movement. With exposure to movement, the latex glove was an equivalent option for overall worker protection, because it was less affected by movement and the permeation rate was lower than that of the nitrile glove. In contrast, the vinyl glove was the least affected by movement, but did not provide adequate chemical resistance to ethyl alcohol in comparison with the nitrile and latex gloves. Glove selection should take movement and polymer type into account. Some glove polymer types are less affected by movement, most notably the latex glove in this test. With nitrile gloves, at least a factor of three should be used when attempting to assign a protection factor when repetitive hand motions are anticipated. Ultimately, the latex gloves outperformed nitrile and vinyl in these tests, which evaluated the effect of movement on chemical permeation. Future research should aim to resolve some of the observed discrepancies in test results with latex and vinyl gloves.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemical protective clothing; dermal protection; exam gloves; personal protective equipment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24689368      PMCID: PMC4177299          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.908259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical performance of powder-free examination gloves.

Authors:  M D Fisher; V R Reddy; F M Williams; K Y Lin; J G Thacker; R F Edlich
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 2.  A critique of assumptions about selecting chemical-resistant gloves: a case for workplace evaluation of glove efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas D Klingner; Mark F Boeniger
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2002-05

3.  A moving robotic hand system for whole-glove permeation and penetration: captan and nitrile gloves.

Authors:  Robert Phalen; Shane Que Hee
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Wearing ambidextrous vinyl gloves does not impair manual dexterity.

Authors:  Tomas Drabek; Charles D Boucek; Charles W Buffington
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Comparing the level of dexterity offered by latex and nitrile SafeSkin gloves.

Authors:  Jo Sawyer; Allan Bennett
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2005-12-15

6.  Integrity of disposable nitrile exam gloves exposed to simulated movement.

Authors:  Robert N Phalen; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  In-use barrier integrity of gloves: latex and nitrile superior to vinyl.

Authors:  A Rego; L Roley
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Grip force and muscle activity differences due to glove type.

Authors:  Kimberly Kovacs; Riley Splittstoesser; Anthony Maronitis; William S Marras
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2002 May-Jun

9.  Wearing the wrong size latex surgical gloves impairs manual dexterity.

Authors:  Tomas Drabek; Charles D Boucek; Charles W Buffington
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Modeling the temperature dependence of N-methylpyrrolidone permeation through butyl- and natural-rubber gloves.

Authors:  E T Zellers; R Sulewski
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1993-09
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Glove permeation of chemicals: The state of the art of current practice-Part 2. Research emphases on high boiling point compounds and simulating the donned glove environment.

Authors:  Sean Banaee; Shane S Que Hee
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: Why it remains a problem?

Authors:  Miaozong Wu; James McIntosh; Jian Liu
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Effect of multiple alcohol-based hand rub applications on the tensile properties of thirteen brands of medical exam nitrile and latex gloves.

Authors:  Pengfei Gao; Matthew Horvatin; George Niezgoda; Robyn Weible; Ronald Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.155

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.