Literature DB >> 21476169

Integrity of disposable nitrile exam gloves exposed to simulated movement.

Robert N Phalen1, Weng Kee Wong.   

Abstract

Every year, millions of health care, first responder, and industry workers are exposed to chemical and biological hazards. Disposable nitrile gloves are a common choice as both a chemical and physical barrier to these hazards, especially as an alternative to natural latex gloves. However, glove selection is complicated by the availability of several types or formulations of nitrile gloves, such as low-modulus, medical grade, low filler, and cleanroom products. This study evaluated the influence of simulated movement on the physical integrity (i.e., holes) of different nitrile exam glove brands and types. Thirty glove products were evaluated out-of-box and after exposure to simulated whole-glove movement for 2 hr. In lieu of the traditional 1 L water-leak test, a modified water-leak test, standardized to detect a 0.15 ± 0.05 mm hole in different regions of the glove, was developed. A specialized air inflation method simulated bidirectional stretching and whole-glove movement. A worst-case scenario with maximum stretching was evaluated. On average, movement did not have a significant effect on glove integrity (chi-square; p=0.068). The average effect was less than 1% between no movement (1.5%) and movement (2.1%) exposures. However, there was significant variability in glove integrity between different glove types (p≤0.05). Cleanroom gloves, on average, had the highest percentage of leaks, and 50% failed the water-leak test. Low-modulus and medical grade gloves had the lowest percentages of leaks, and no products failed the water-leak test. Variability in polymer formulation was suspected to account for the observed discrepancies, as well as the inability of the traditional 1 L water-leak test to detect holes in finger/thumb regions. Unexpectedly, greater than 80% of the glove defects were observed in the finger and thumb regions. It is recommended that existing water-leak tests be re-evaluated and standardized to account for product variability.
Copyright © 2011 JOEH, LLC

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476169      PMCID: PMC3124250          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.569285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  14 in total

1.  Integrity of powder-free examination gloves to bacteriophage penetration.

Authors:  R F Edlich; F Suber; J G Neal; E M Jackson; F M Williams
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999

2.  The integrity of latex gloves in clinical dental practice.

Authors:  F A Pitten; G Herdemann; A Kramer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Glove leakage rates as a function of latex content and brand: caveat emptor.

Authors:  C A Muto; M G Sistrom; B A Strain; B M Farr
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

Review 4.  A critique of assumptions about selecting chemical-resistant gloves: a case for workplace evaluation of glove efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas D Klingner; Mark F Boeniger
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2002-05

5.  Failure rates in nonlatex surgical gloves.

Authors:  Denise M Korniewicz; Laurel Garzon; Judy Seltzer; Manning Feinleib
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Scientific basis for the selection of emergency medical examination gloves for emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, and emergency department personnel. An update.

Authors:  Richard F Edlich; Kathryne L Winters; Marcus L Martin; William B Long Iii; Charles L Werner; K Dean Gubler
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2005

7.  Assessment of the durability of medical examination gloves.

Authors:  Lesley N Kerr; Maria P Chaput; Lisa D Cash; Louis G O'Malley; Elmiloudi M Sarhrani; Joseph C Teixeira; William S Boivin; Seth A Mailhot
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  A moving robotic hand system for whole-glove permeation and penetration: captan and nitrile gloves.

Authors:  Robert Phalen; Shane Que Hee
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  In-use barrier integrity of gloves: latex and nitrile superior to vinyl.

Authors:  A Rego; L Roley
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.918

10.  Scientific basis for selection of emergency medical examination gloves for emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, and emergency department personnel.

Authors:  Richard F Edlich; Catherine C Taylor; Kathryne Winters; Marcus L Martin; Gloria Anima; William B Long; Charles L Werner; Colette R Perches
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2004
View more
  4 in total

1.  Changes in chemical permeation of disposable latex, nitrile, and vinyl gloves exposed to simulated movement.

Authors:  Robert N Phalen; Thi Le; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Performance analysis of exam gloves used for aseptic rodent surgery.

Authors:  Dana M LeMoine; Valerie K Bergdall; Carrie Freed
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Tensile properties and integrity of clean room and low-modulus disposable nitrile gloves: a comparison of two dissimilar glove types.

Authors:  Robert N Phalen; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-12-26

4.  Chemical resistance of disposable nitrile gloves exposed to simulated movement.

Authors:  Robert N Phalen; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.